Why is clear glass see-through but not completely invisible?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
16 replies · 5K views
motleycat
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Why is a smooth clean piece of glass transparent but not invisible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DaleSpam said:
What is the difference between transparent and invisible?

Transparent objects allow light to pass through neither absorbing nor reflecting nor scattering it. Invisible objects are not perceivable by vision.
 
motleycat said:
Transparent objects allow light to pass through neither absorbing nor reflecting nor scattering it. Invisible objects are not perceivable by vision.
There is always some scattering, particularly from the edges. Indeed, if there is no scattering, absorption or reflection, the object will indeed be invisible. That is, however, the ideal case.
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
There is always some scattering, particularly from the edges. Indeed, if there is no scattering, absorption or reflection, the object will indeed be invisible. That is, however, the ideal case.

So the fact that glass scatters light makes it transparent but not invisible?
 
motleycat said:
Transparent objects allow light to pass through neither absorbing nor reflecting nor scattering it. Invisible objects are not perceivable by vision.
So what other optical properties or effects might a transparent object have that would be percievable by vision? Can you think of any other quantity that is often used to characterize transparent media?
 
DaleSpam said:
So what other optical properties or effects might a transparent object have that would be percievable by vision? Can you think of any other quantity that is often used to characterize transparent media?

I thought about it but I can't come up with anything else unfortunately.
 
DaleSpam said:
Refraction. It is the thing that makes lenses work and makes straight sticks look bent when they go from water to air.
But the medium of transmission is a smooth piece of glass.
 
As DaleSpam points out, refraction makes even transparent objects "visible" because you can see the "bending" of light as it passes through the object. It is also true that the edges of any object, glass or whatever, are rough enough to scatter light, also making the object "visible"
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
As DaleSpam points out, refraction makes even transparent objects "visible" because you can see the "bending" of light as it passes through the object.
But refraction occurs only when the light passes the boundary between media such as air and glass at an angle. It doesn't happen when the light hits the boundary in a direction perpendicular to the medium.
Isn't this relevant?
 
Last edited:
DaleSpam said:
Yes. Do you know what refraction is? You may want to read about it.
I wasn't sure at first because English is not my first language but I brushed up on my knowledge of it. However, as I replied to Chandra Prayaga refraction occurs only when the light passes the boundary between media such as air and glass at an angle. It doesn't happen when the light hits the boundary in a direction perpendicular to the medium as far as I know.
Isn't this also of relevance when answering the question?
 
Your eyes are not limited to viewing surfaces at right angles. Particularly with binocular vision, it would be unusual to find a transparent object positioned such that all of its surfaces were perpendicular to your vision.
 

The youtube video above, is a demonstration of why the refractive index is important here, not just the transmission.