cragar
- 2,546
- 3
Is it possible to travel .999999999 repeating the speed of light , because that would be a 1 in math .
The discussion revolves around the possibility of traveling at speeds approaching the speed of light, specifically at .999999999 repeating the speed of light. Participants explore the mathematical implications of repeating decimals and the physical constraints on massive objects reaching such velocities.
Participants express differing views on the mathematical interpretation of repeating decimals and the physical feasibility of massive objects reaching speeds close to the speed of light. No consensus is reached on the implications of these discussions.
Limitations include the dependence on definitions of repeating decimals and the unresolved nature of energy requirements for massive objects approaching light speed.
cragar said:Is it possible to travel .999999999 repeating the speed of light , because that would be a 1 in math .
Vanadium 50 said:And .999999999 doesn't equal 1, "in math". Those numbers differ by .00000001.
More precisely, the limit of the series 0.99, 0.99, 0.999, ... equals one.negitron said:No, but ".999999 repeating" does. It seems clear that what he really means is the more conventional ".999999..."
cragar said:Is it possible to travel .999999999 repeating the speed of light , because that would be a 1 in math .
Of course, that's exactly what "0.999 repeating" means.Hootenanny said:More precisely, the limit of the series 0.99, 0.99, 0.999, ... equals one.
You can get arbitrarily close to C. Every time a new, bigger particle accelerator is built, they add a couple of more 9's to that.cragar said:so then what could be that fastest you could travel if you had mass .
cragar said:so then what could be that fastest you could travel if you had mass .