Travelling greater than speed of light

ABHISEK DATTA
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
It is known that in a medium of refractive index 'n' , the speed of light becomes c/n. So if we can make a medium of high refractive index, then the speed of light will be substantially less in that medium. Then it can be possible to accelerate particles inside that medium at speeds greater than the speed of light in that medium i.e. 'c/n'. Then what will be our observation from an stationary frame of reference ? What will be the observation from the particle's frame of reference ? Will the particle travel in time as it is crossing the speed of light in its surrounding medium ?

Also one problem in reaching the speed of light 'c' in vacuum was that - as the speed of a particle approaches 'c' its relativistic mass increases and at v=c, its mass becomes infinite. But in the case as described above the particle is able to cross the speed of light in that medium (of refractive index 'n') without reaching 'c' , and thus its mass does not become infinite.

So is time travel really possible for that particle in that medium of refractive index 'n' ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ABHISEK DATTA said:
So is time travel really possible for that particle in that medium of refractive index 'n' ?
No. Realize that the limiting speed in relativity is c = 3 x 108 m/s, which happens to be the speed of light in a vacuum, not the speed of light in some medium.
 
yeah, i know about Cerenkov radiation, but that doesn't quite answer my question
 
And, yeah its true that the limiting speed in relativity is 3x10^8 m/s. But my main question is whether the particle will be able to experience time travel or not ? You can assume that the medium of refractive index 'n' is the world for that particle, and in its world the particle is traveling faster than light.
For time travel, i.e. to travel to the future, i think its not necessary to cross 'c', but to cross the speed of light in your surroundings, even if it is c/n. By traveling greater than c/n, the particle with will travel to the future with respect to the observer inside that medium.
 
ABHISEK DATTA said:
For time travel, i.e. to travel to the future, i think its not necessary to cross 'c', but to cross the speed of light in your surroundings, even if it is c/n. By traveling greater than c/n, the particle with will travel to the future with respect to the observer inside that medium.
Well, you're wrong. Time travel (and it's associated paradoxes) would happen if particles could go faster than 3 x 108 m/s, not simply 'faster than light'.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top