MHB Travis Henderson's Question: Optimizing f(x,y,z) with Constraint

AI Thread Summary
The objective function f(x,y,z)=x^4+y^4+z^4 is analyzed under the constraint x^2+y^2+z^2=1 using Lagrange multipliers. Critical points are identified, resulting in 12 points where one variable is zero and the other two are equal, yielding a function value of 1/2. Additionally, there are 6 points where two variables are zero and one is ±1, giving a value of 1. Finally, 8 points arise from equal variables, leading to a minimum value of 1/3. The maximum value is confirmed to be 1, while the minimum is 1/3.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Travis,

We are given the objective function:

$f(x,y,z)=x^4+y^4+z^4$

subject to the constraint:

$g(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2-1=0$

Using Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$4x^3=\lambda(2x)$

$4y^3=\lambda(2y)$

$4z^3=\lambda(2z)$

We see that 12 critical points arise when one of the variables is zero, and the other two are not zero. We see that the other two have to be equal, and their value is found from the constraint:

$y^2+x^2=1$

$x=y=\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$

The 12 critical points come from the permutations of:

$\displaystyle \left(0,\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \right),\,\left(\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},0,\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \right),\,\left(\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},0 \right)$

The objective function's value is the same at each of the 12 points and is given by:

$f_1=\dfrac{1}{2}$

We also see that there are 6 critical values that arise from two of the varaibles being zero, and the other one being $\pm1$. They are:

$(0,0,\pm1),\,(0,\pm1,0),\,(\pm1,0,0)$

The objective function's value is the same at each of the 12 points and is given by:

$f_2=1$

Lastly the other 8 critical values comes from:

$x=y=z$

and substituting into the constraint, we find:

$x=y=z=\pm\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}}$

and so we have the 8 permutations of:

$f_3=f\left(\pm\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}},\pm\dfrac{1}{ \sqrt{3}},\pm\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \right)=\dfrac{1}{3}$

Hence we find:

$f_{\text{min}}=\dfrac{1}{3}$

$f_{\text{max}}=1$
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top