MHB Discovering the Truth Behind the Side Ratios of a 30:40:90 Triangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeusAbscondus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the side ratios of a right triangle, specifically questioning the validity of multiplying the ratio 1:√3:2 by various integers while maintaining the Pythagorean identity. It is clarified that a triangle with angles of 30 and 40 degrees cannot exist, as the correct angles for the given side ratios are 30, 60, and 90 degrees. An arithmetic error was acknowledged by one participant, leading to confusion over the triangle's classification. The conversation also touches on the intersection of mathematics and belief systems, highlighting a participant's surprise at the coexistence of faith and mathematical understanding in some individuals. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of accuracy in mathematical discussions.
DeusAbscondus
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
(Plse bear with me: until i learn how to fly this thing, / must stand for radical)

If the side ratio for a 30:40:90 deg right triangle are 1 : /3 : 2
then, is the following true:

one may multiply this ratio by 1,2,3 or 5,6,7,8,9 or 10 and the pythagorean identity obtains but NOT by 4

If so, why not?

Thx,
Godfree
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
DeusAbscondus said:
(Plse bear with me: until i learn how to fly this thing, / must stand for radical)

If the side ratio for a 30:40:90 deg right triangle are 1 : /3 : 2
then, is the following true:

one may multiply this ratio by 1,2,3 or 5,6,7,8,9 or 10 and the pythagorean identity obtains but NOT by 4

If so, why not?

Thx,
Godfree

A right triangle cannot have 30 and 40 degrees for its other two angles, in fact if the side rations of a triangle are \(1,\ \sqrt{3},\ 2\) then it is a 30,60,90 degree triangle

CB
 
Thank's Cap'n; it was an arithmetic error, that was all...
I'll be more careful before posting next time... sheeesh, i wasted 4 hours looking at this today, and kept making the same tiny error in my math...
Anyway, i heartily concur with Epicurius' sentiments and, by inference, your core values: i find a lot in common with non-believers, with atheists actually (why be coy) but I'm constantly amazed at how people (like my teacher) can do higher maths and still believe in invisible friends in the sky, and hold a young Earth model in the same brain. Enough off-topic.
Thanks again,
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
62
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top