Triangle's elementary geometry problem

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the geometry problem involving triangle ABC, participants explored various methods to determine the ratio BP:PC. Initial attempts included using vectors and proportions, but these approaches led to dead ends. Eventually, a coordinate system was established, simplifying the problem and revealing that P is located at (1/3, 1/3), resulting in a ratio of BP:PC equal to 2:1. An official resolution was also presented, utilizing geometric principles and similarity of triangles to confirm the same ratio. The consensus emphasizes that the problem can be effectively solved through geometric reasoning rather than complex calculations.
Vahn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let \bigtriangleup ABC be a right angled triangle such that \angle A = 90°, AB = AC and let M be the midpoint of the side AC. Take the point P on the side BC so that AP is vertical to BM. Let H be the intersection point of AP and BM. Find the ratio BP:PC.

Homework Equations



Possibly the intercept theorem and others related to the congruency of line segments and triangles similarity.

The Attempt at a Solution



I first tried to attack the problem using vectors, but my limited knowledge of their rules meant I quickly found a dead-end. I then tried expressing BP as BC-PC, and since BC is the hypotenuse, the ratio is \frac{AB\sqrt{2}}{PC} - 1, but could not figure how to express PC as a function of AB.

I then spent some days trying to fiddle with proportions to no avail. My last try involved connecting the points C and H, and then extending the resulting line segment until it crossed AB, and called that point C'. By Ceva's theorem, I found out that \frac{BP}{PC} = \frac{BC'}{AC'} and then, using the intercept theorem, \frac{BP}{BC'} = \frac{PC}{AC'} = \frac{BC}{AB} = \sqrt{2}. I can't figure out what to do with that information, so it's another dead end.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What I would do is set up a coordinate system. Take A to be at (0, 0), B at (0, 1), and C at (1, 0). The M is at (1/2, 0) and it is easy to find the equation of line BM and then line AP. Use that to find point P.
 
I see. So, assuming C = (0,0), A = (1, 0), B = (1, 1), I have:

BM: y_{BM} = 2 x_{BM} - 1
AP: y_{AP} = \frac{- x_{AP} + 1}{2}
BC: y_{BC} = x_{BC}

So P = (\frac{1}{3}, \frac{1}{3}) and BP:PC=2:1, which is the correct answer :).

However, the 'official' resolution of this problem is the following:

1 - \bigtriangleup AHM = \bigtriangleup HCM

2 - \frac{\bigtriangleup ABH}{\bigtriangleup HBP} = \frac{\bigtriangleup AHC}{\bigtriangleup HPC}

3 - \frac{\bigtriangleup ABH}{\bigtriangleup HBP} = \frac{2 \bigtriangleup AHM}{\bigtriangleup HPC} = \frac{1}{2}

4 - \frac{BP}{PC} = \frac{\bigtriangleup HBP}{\bigtriangleup HPC} = 2

I'm completely lost.
 
You can do it with just geometry. At C draw a line parallel to AP meeting BA extended at W. Then triangle AWC is similar to AMB. This gives AW/AM = AC/AB = 2AM/AB or

AW = 2 AM2/AB

Now BP/PC = BA/AW. Substitute AW from the above equation into this giving

BP/PC =(1/2)(BA/AM)2= (1/2)*4 = 2
 
Back
Top