Calculating Volume of Intersecting Spheres | Calculus III Problem"

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of the solid formed by the intersection of two spheres defined by their equations. The first sphere's equation was transformed into standard form, revealing its center and radius. The user proposes minimizing the distance from the origin to the center of the first sphere to determine the thickness of the intersecting slices. A more efficient method was suggested, involving finding the shortest distance using a line equation that connects the origin to the center of the sphere. The final volume calculation was performed using integration, yielding a result of 10π/3, which the user seeks to confirm as correct.
themadhatter1
Messages
139
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the volume of the solid that lies in between both of the spheres:

x2+y2+z2+4x+2y+4z+5=0
and
x2+y2+z2=4

Homework Equations


This is the first chapter of the calculus III material so no double or triple integrals are needed to solve this problem.

The Attempt at a Solution



I completed the square on the first equation and obtained:

(x+2)2+(y-2)2+(z+2)2=4

So I just have 2 intersecting spheres. Finding the volume of a "slice" of a sphere can be done using a solid of revolution, however, I would need know how far one sphere is intersecting into the other in order to calculate the volume.

My idea is to minimize the distance between (x+2)2+(y-2)2+(z+2)2=4 and the point (0,0,0). Then I will be able to figure out how "thick" the 2 "slices" of the spheres are.

However, I'm not quite sure how to do this. I know how to find the distance between points in space but solving for each variable I will wind up with 2 solutions because of the radical. Is there an easier way to do this that I am missing?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the easiest way to solve this is by calculating a double integral with spherical coordinates, but you said that this is not needed.

Your method is also nice, but a little more work. Let's see if we can do it right.

We need to find the shortest distance between (0,0,0) and the equation (x+2)^2+(y-2)^2+(z+2)^2=4.
We can do that by calculus by minimizing a certain function, but that might get tedious. Here's another method: the line which has the shortest distance connect (0,0,0) with (-2,2,-2) (the center of the circle). So you only need to set up the equation of the line and see where it intersects the sphere.
 
Genius! I love it. Can't believe I didn't think of that.

so for the line I I created the equation x=-2t,y=t,z=-2t

Next I plugged the equation into the sphere with it's center at (-2,1,-2) obtaining...

<br /> (-2t+2)^2+(t-1)^2+(-2t+2)^2=4<br /><br /> 2(4t^2-8t+4)+(t^2-2t+1)=4<br /><br /> 9t^2-18t+5=0<br /><br /> t=\frac{1}{3},\frac{5}{3}<br />

The first t value is the one that will help me so I plugged it back into my equation for a line, obtaining(\frac{-2}{3},\frac{1}{3},\frac{-2}{3})

The distance from (0,0,0) to this point turns out conveniently be 1. So one half of the solid section has a distance of 1 from the edge of the sphere.

Now I integrate to find the volume of the whole solid.

2\pi\int^{2}_{1}4-y^2 dy = 2\pi[4y-\frac{y^3}{3}]^{2}_{1}=\frac{10\pi}{3}

Does this look correct?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K