Trig Substitution for ∫x^3/(4x^2+9)^(3/2): Solving the Insanity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral ∫x^3/(4x^2 + 9)^(3/2) is solved using trigonometric substitution, specifically substituting x with (3/2)tan(θ). The confusion arises when substituting this value into the denominator, where the book incorrectly uses 3tan(θ) instead of the agreed substitution. The correct substitution leads to √(4x^2 + 9) simplifying to 3sec(θ). This integral can also be approached without trigonometric substitution, as indicated by additional resources shared in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities, particularly secant and tangent functions.
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, specifically trigonometric substitution.
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation involving square roots and fractions.
  • Basic calculus concepts, including integrals and derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of trigonometric substitution in integrals, focusing on examples similar to ∫x^3/(4x^2 + 9)^(3/2).
  • Learn about alternative methods for solving integrals, such as partial fraction decomposition.
  • Explore the use of trigonometric identities in simplifying integrals.
  • Review calculus textbooks or online resources that cover integration techniques in depth.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on integration techniques, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of trigonometric substitutions in integrals.

GraceLee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
∫x3
----------------------
(4x2 + 9) 3/2

According to my book this is a trig substitution integral. The normal procedure is to substitute atanθ for x when one has a square root w an argument of the form x^2 + a^2. Because the argument of the square root is 4x2 + 9, as opposed to simply x2 +9, the book suggests substituting 2x for x, hence instead of substituting 3tanθ for x- you sub 3/2tanθ. That much makes sense to me. The part that is driving me insane is that the book goes on to complete the trig substitution by substituting this x value (3/2 tanθ) for x in the numerator (ok), substituting 3/2sec2θdθ for dx (ok)... however in the denominator, they write √(4x^2 +9) = √9tan^2θ +9 = 3secθ. That's not substituting the "agreed upon" value of x (i.e., 3/2tanθ) it's just substituting 3tanθ! This is my first post and I'm no math genius so I'm certain I'm just not comprehending something but I've been stuck on this for a while and it's driving me nuts! Any help would greatly appreciated- I hope this post is fairly intelligible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Grace, don't worry the post is legible - just plug the substitution into the denominator to see they are substituting in the agreed upon value for x:

\sqrt{4x^2+9} = \sqrt{4(\tfrac{3}{2}\tan(\theta))^2+9} =
\sqrt{4(\tfrac{9}{4}\tan^2(\theta)) +9} = \sqrt{9 \tan^2(\theta) +9} = \sqrt{9 (\tan^2(\theta) +1)} = 3 \sqrt{\tan^2(\theta) +1} = 3 \sqrt{\sec^2(\theta)} = 3\sec (\theta)

I think you just forgot to write a 4 in one step & got confused as a result of this. Also, this & this link show you that you don't have to use trig substitutions in this case necessarily, if you're interested :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K