Trinomial and Multinomial theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter RandomMystery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the sum notation for the multinomial theorem, specifically for the expression (a+b+c)^n. Participants express confusion regarding the notation, particularly the roles of the indices i, j, and k, and the absence of a number above the sigma symbol. It is clarified that the summation is over all non-negative integers i, j, and k such that i + j + k = n, and this condition can be stated either above or below the summation symbol. The multinomial coefficient is defined as \binom{n}{a,b,c} = n!/(a!b!c!), which generalizes the binomial coefficient. Understanding this notation is crucial for correctly applying the multinomial theorem in combinatorial problems.
RandomMystery
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
I can't understand the sum notation shown in Wikipedia or in this article:

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/53159.html

I want to find the sum notation for (a+b+c)^n
however I can't understand the sum notation:

a3b5ea89c1417ff4ef0c05ea0b7a43a6.png


I don't understand the use of brackets or what they mean here and in the binomial theorem.

I think they are what Wikipedia calls the binomial coefficient:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem

I also don't understand, is that they are taking the some from i,k,j to what? Shouldn't their be a number on top of the sigma?

I would appreciate the help!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The notation here is a so-called multinomial coefficient, which is a generalization of a binomail coefficient. The definition is

\binom{n}{a,b,c}=\frac{n!}{a!b!c!}

A binomial coefficient

\binom{n}{k}

then equal the multinomial coefficient

\binom{n}{k,n-k}
 
RandomMystery said:
I can't understand the sum notation shown in Wikipedia or in this article:

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/53159.html

I want to find the sum notation for (a+b+c)^n
however I can't understand the sum notation:

a3b5ea89c1417ff4ef0c05ea0b7a43a6.png


[snip]

I also don't understand, is that they are taking the some from i,k,j to what? Shouldn't their be a number on top of the sigma?

I would appreciate the help!
Adding to Micromass's remarks, the summation is meant to be over all triples i, j, k where i \ge 0, j \ge 0, k \ge 0 and i+j+k=n
 
Okay, thanks but I still don't understand the multi variable summation notation-

What does the i,j,k under the sigma represent and why is there nothing on "top" of the sigma?

Does this notation also assume that:

"the summation is meant to be over all triples i, j, k where i≥0,j≥0,k≥0 and
i+j+k=n"

are must this be stated separately from the Summation?
 
There should be something in the text saying that the summation is over i,j,k where i+j+k=n. Sometimes you will see i+j+k=n written under the summation symbol instead.
 
It doesn't matter for i+j+k=n is over or under the summation symbol. It means how many ways to make i+j+k=n, where i,j,k≥ 0.
For example: (a+b+c)3
i+j+k=3
How many ways to make i+j+k=3?
3+0+0=3 => i=3,j=0,k=0
0+3+0=3 => i=0,j=3,k=0
0+0+3=3 => i=0,j=0,k=3
1+1+1=3 => i=1,j=1,k=1
2+1+0=3 => i=2,j=1,k=0
2+0+1=3 => i=2,j=0,k=1
1+2+0=3 => i=1,j=2,k=0
1+0+2=3 => i=1,j=0,k=2
0+2+1=3 => i=0,j=2,k=1
0+1+2=3 => i=0,j=1,k=2
 
Another way to expand (a+b+c)n is using Pascal's Triangle.
 
Back
Top