Trouble applying the concept of momentum conservation

AI Thread Summary
Momentum conservation is confirmed in the described collision problem, as external forces acting on the pucks are balanced, ensuring total momentum is conserved. The confusion arises from comparing the momentum vectors before and after the collision, which appear unequal in their components; however, this does not indicate a violation of momentum conservation. It is clarified that while total momentum is conserved, it can be redistributed between the pucks, affecting their individual velocities. To find the final velocity of Puck B, one can use the conservation equations for each momentum component, confirming that the system's net momentum remains constant. Understanding that momentum can transfer between objects is key to resolving the initial confusion.
vineroon
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
v60yz4.jpg


I am having trouble applying the concept of momentum conservation to this problem. The particular problem I am having is in figuring out if I did part (c) correctly.

A look at Puck A:

It is evident that total the momentum is conserved before the collision because the external forces acting on the pucks (the normal force exerted by the ground on the puck and the weight of the puck) both add up to zero. Therefore, according to definition, the total momentum is conserved.

However, the specific text I am referencing for this material states that "conservation of momentum means conservation of its components." Yet, the momentum vector before collision is .400i + .300j and the momentum vector after collision is .300i + .400j. The components of these two vectors are not equal, so does that suggest that momentum ISN'T conserved?

Part (c):

Could you assume that if the total momentum is conserved, you can solve for the final velocity of Puck B by setting (m)(v_1x) = (m)(v_2x) and (m)(v_1y) = (m)(v_2y)? This would give you the exact x and y components of initial Puck B velocity, including the signs. However, the magnitude would still remain the same and agrees with the assumption.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


vineroon said:
[...]Yet, the momentum vector before collision is .400i + .300j and the momentum vector after collision is .300i + .400j. The components of these two vectors are not equal, so does that suggest that momentum ISN'T conserved?

Momentum is conserved, it's just that some of the momentum has been passed off to the other puck. The net momentum in each dimension will always be the same (in this example).

vineroon said:
Part (c):

Could you assume that if the total momentum is conserved, you can solve for the final velocity of Puck B by setting (m)(v_1x) = (m)(v_2x) and (m)(v_1y) = (m)(v_2y)? This would give you the exact x and y components of initial Puck B velocity, including the signs. However, the magnitude would still remain the same and agrees with the assumption.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

So sum up the total momentum in each plane, subtract final momentum of puck A from this, you get final momentum for puck B.
Take the magnitude of this for final momentum, divide by mass for final velocity.
 


Rake-MC said:
Momentum is conserved, it's just that some of the momentum has been passed off to the other puck. The net momentum in each dimension will always be the same (in this example).
So sum up the total momentum in each plane, subtract final momentum of puck A from this, you get final momentum for puck B.
Take the magnitude of this for final momentum, divide by mass for final velocity.

Alright, that seems a lot more straightforward. Thanks a lot. :D
 


Not necessarily.
Because both pucks have identical mass, it is infact possible to say that the final velocity of the system in each dimension is the same as the initial. But you cannot simply say the final velocity of each puck is the same as initial (in each dimension).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top