Trouble understanding frames in relativity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding frames in relativity, particularly regarding time dilation and the relativity of simultaneity. Key points include the importance of using 2D Minkowski diagrams to visualize events in different frames, with specific calculations showing discrepancies between time intervals in the Earth and satellite frames. The confusion arises from assuming that events occur simultaneously in both frames, which is not the case. Proper length measurements are discussed, clarifying that while certain values are correct, they do not represent the same physical distances in different frames. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately interpreting relativistic scenarios.
approximatelysphere
Messages
13
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
I'm having trouble with this specific problem/though experiment: Suppose you have a satellite travelling at v=0.8c and at t=0 it aligns with the earth. At t=1 year in the earth's frame of reference, a signal from mission control on earth is sent to the satellite. How long does it take for the signal to travel from earth to the satellite, in the earth's frame and in the satellite's frame?
Relevant Equations
dt=dt'/(1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2)

L=(1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2)*L'
I have attached a copy of my work as a pdf file. Please excuse my non-rigorous usage of notation.

Thank you so much!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Your diagrams are not very useful. You want to draw 2D Minkovski diagrams:

For the diagram in the earth's frame you have one line for the satellite position: ##x = 0.8 ct## and one for the light signal: ##x = c(t-1)##. Where do they intersect ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
Where do they intersect ?

Very good. At ## x= 4, \ ct = 5## light years ! (*)
In agreement with your PDF page 1.

Then, on page 2: the time dilation formula yields ##\Delta t' = 2.4## years. (never forget the units)

Here, however, your confusion has already started: Four years have passed in the earth's frame. Equivalent to 2.4 years in the satellite's frame-- but these intervals DO NOT START OR END AT THE SAME TIME in both frames!

The four years is the right answer to the first part of the problem. For the second part some work needs to be done.

Then:
L = 0.8ly is the “proper length” of
the separation between the earth and the satellite in the earth’s reference frame.
is still correct. It is also the “proper length” of the separation between the earth and the satellite in the satellite’s reference frame (of course :wink:)

Even the 0.48 ly is right, but it is not the distance the light has to travel in the satellite frame !!!!

At this point I would like to refer to a PF singularity's signature:​
"You did not take relativity of simultaneity into account." - The answer to 99% of all paradox threads in the relativity forum​

Earth and satellite do NOT, however have the same times nor x-coordinates for the event 'departure of the signal from earth', as becomes clear from the Minkovski diagrams, and also when one does the calculations :

(*) to check things, we are going to use the Lorentz transform and see what the satellite frame coordinates for the events A and B are.
Notation: ##x, \ ct## unprimed is in earth frame,
##x', \ ct'## primed is in satellite frame. Units are light years.

For the earth frame we have ##\beta = v/c = 0.8,\ \gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2} = 1/0.6##
For the satellite frame we have ##\beta' = v'/c = -0.8## !

For A, the arrival of the signal at the satellite: $$\begin{align*}
x'&= \gamma(x - \beta ct) &= 0 & \phantom{x} \\
ct'&= \gamma(ct - \beta x) &= 3 &\phantom{x} \\ \end{align*}
$$For B, the departure of the signal from earth: $$\begin{align*}
x'&= \gamma(x - \beta ct) &= -0.8/0.6 &=-4/3 \\
ct'&= \gamma(ct - \beta x) &= \phantom{-}1/0.6 &=\phantom{-}5/3 \\ \end{align*}$$
It is instructive to do the inverse transform too !

At last, we can work out the second part of the answer to our problem: arrival at ##ct'= 3 ## ly, departure at ##ct'= 5/3 ## ly, so the light has traveled for 4/3 year on the satellite's clock.

Note that
approximatelysphere said:
non-rigorous usage of notation
is an invitation for errors to sneak in.

And the diagrams:

1727789664983.png


1727789626361.png



##\ ##
 
Hi, thank you so much for your detailed answer. Please excuse me for not replying for so long. Life has been very very chaotic.

Even the 0.48 ly is right, but it is not the distance the light has to travel in the satellite frame !!!!

Could you please explain what this o.48 ly actually is a measure of?
Here, however, your confusion has already started: Four years have passed in the earth's frame. Equivalent to 2.4 years in the satellite's frame-- but these intervals DO NOT START OR END AT THE SAME TIME in both frames!
By this, do you mean that 4 years passed is indeed 2.4 years in the satellite's frame, but since the event of the departure of light does not happen simultaneously in both frames, 2.4 is not necessarily the number of years needed for light to travel from the earth to the satellite in the satellite's frame?

BvU said:
Earth and satellite do NOT, however have the same times nor x-coordinates for the event 'departure of the signal from earth', as becomes clear from the Minkovski diagrams, and also when one does the calculations :
Aha! So my main mistake is assuming that light departs from the earth in the earth's frame at the same moment as in the satellite's frame?
 
approximatelysphere said:
Aha! So my main mistake is assuming that light departs from the earth in the earth's frame at the same moment time coordinate as in the satellite's frame?
I've made a change to what you wrote. To understand reference frames, you should start thinking in terms of coordinates in spacetime.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller and jbriggs444
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top