Trouble Understanding Light: Seeking Help

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Garlic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the understanding of light, particularly the nature of electromagnetic waves and the role of photons. Participants explore concepts related to classical electrodynamics, the visualization of waves in a vacuum, and the relationship between electric and magnetic fields. The scope includes theoretical explanations and conceptual clarifications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in visualizing light as a wave that does not require a medium, questioning how oscillating electric and magnetic fields can exist in a vacuum.
  • Another participant suggests forgetting the concept of photons for a better understanding of light, proposing to think of light as "flashes" or "radio signals" instead.
  • It is noted that electric and magnetic fields can exist in a vacuum and interact with charged particles, even without a medium.
  • Participants describe electromagnetic waves as fluctuations in electric and magnetic fields, likening them to ripples in water waves.
  • Questions arise regarding why electromagnetic waves do not carry electrical or magnetic charge despite fluctuations in field strength.
  • Participants discuss the right-angled nature of the field fluctuations, referencing Maxwell's equations but acknowledging the lack of a simple non-mathematical explanation for this phenomenon.
  • There is mention of virtual photons in the context of quantum field theory, with a distinction made that this topic is beyond the current discussion focused on classical electromagnetic waves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the visualization of light and the implications of photons versus classical wave descriptions. Multiple competing views remain regarding the understanding of electromagnetic waves and their properties.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the reliance on mathematical concepts such as Maxwell's equations, which may not be accessible to all participants. The discussion also highlights the distinction between classical and quantum descriptions of light, indicating that a full understanding may require advanced study.

Garlic
Gold Member
Messages
181
Reaction score
72
Hello everyone,
Although there are lots of things that I know about light, I have trouble really understanding it. I can't visualize a wave that doesn't need a medium to move. Photons are electrically neutral, so how is the thing with vertical and horizontal oscillating electric and magnetic fields happen? Everything that I've learned in the school seems to be just repetitions of subconscious memorisations.

Thank you
Note: I know this is a frequenly asked question, but other threads couldn't help me understand.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Garlic said:
Hello everyone,
Although there are lots of things that I know about light, I have trouble really understanding it. I can't visualize a wave that doesn't need a medium to move. Photons are electrically neutral, so how is the thing with vertical and horizontal oscillating electric and magnetic fields happen? Everything that I've learned in the school seems to be just repetitions of subconscious memorisations.

First step is to try to forget that you ever heard the word "photon" - the popular notion of photons as particles of light is seriously misleading and just getting in the way here. You won't need photons until you get to quantum mechanics; until then, every time you find yourself thinking "photon" you should try mentally substituting "flash of light" or "radio signal".

Second step is to consider that electrical and magnetic fields exist in a vacuum just fine: The electric field of a charged particle in outer space will interact with other nearby charged particles even though there's just vacuum between the particles.

Now it's easy at a non-mathematical level: the electromagnetic waves are rippling fluctuations in the strength of the electrical and magnetic fields, the same way that water waves are rippling fluctuations in the height of the water's surface. The fields are everywhere so the electromagnetic waves can go everywhere.

At a more mathematical and less hand-waving level, you can read through the sections of Purcell's E&M textbook (I believe that @bcrowell may have a pointer to a licensed non-pirated online copy) where he shows how these "ripples" form and propagate; and if you're really going to understand, sooner or later you're going to have to take on Maxwell's equations (discovered in 1861 and the basis for all of classical electrodynamics).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
Nugatory said:
First step is to try to forget that you ever heard the word "photon" - the popular notion of photons as particles of light is seriously misleading and just getting in the way here. You won't need photons until you get to quantum mechanics; until then, every time you find yourself thinking "photon" you should try mentally substituting "flash of light" or "radio signal".

Second step is to consider that electrical and magnetic fields exist in a vacuum just fine: The electric field of a charged particle in outer space will interact with other nearby charged particles even though there's just vacuum between the particles.

Now it's easy at a non-mathematical level: the electromagnetic waves are rippling fluctuations in the strength of the electrical and magnetic fields, the same way that water waves are rippling fluctuations in the height of the water's surface. The fields are everywhere so the electromagnetic waves can go everywhere.

At a more mathematical and less hand-waving level, you can read through the sections of Purcell's E&M textbook where he shows how these "ripples" form and propagate; and if you're really going to understand, sooner or later you're going to have to take on Maxwell's equations (discovered in 1861 and the basis for all of classical electrodynamics).

What is the reason that they aren't carry electrical or magnetic charge even though their strenght fluctates?
What is the reason that the two field fluctations are right angled? Is it so that they somehow negate each other?

...and I have already stirred my mind enough with quantum physics, aren't the mediating particle of em force virtual photons instead of photons?
 
Garlic said:
What is the reason that they aren't carry electrical or magnetic charge even though their strenght fluctates?
Because the ripples in the field carry energy and momentum but they don't move the charge itself. It's easy to see this if you consider two like-charged particles near each other - they're pushed apart, gaining kinetic energy and momentum in the process, but their charges are unchanged.
What is the reason that the two field fluctuations are right angled? Is it so that they somehow negate each other?
The right-angled field fluctuations jump out at you if look at Maxwell's equations, but I know of no easy non-mathematical explanation for why that happens. Your choices here are basically to learn the math (typically in the first year of a college physics program) or take the word of someone who has learned it.
and I have already stirred my mind enough with quantum physics, aren't the mediating particle of em force virtual photons instead of photons?
They are, but that's quantum field theory which combines relativity and quantum mechanics; you won't come to it until several years after you first learn quantum mechanics. However, none of this matters for understanding electromagnetic waves at the level we're discussing in this post, and none of it changes my recommendation that you try to forget that you ever heard the word "photon" for now.

Electromagnetic waves are a classical phenomenon, discovered and well understand decades before either relativity or quantum mechanics, and you understand them by applying classical electrodynamics.
 
Nugatory said:
Because the ripples in the field carry energy and momentum but they don't move the charge itself. It's easy to see this if you consider two like-charged particles near each other - they're pushed apart, gaining kinetic energy and momentum in the process, but their charges are unchanged.

The right-angled field fluctuations jump out at you if look at Maxwell's equations, but I know of no easy non-mathematical explanation for why that happens. Your choices here are basically to learn the math (typically in the first year of a college physics program) or take the word of someone who has learned it.

They are, but that's quantum field theory which combines relativity and quantum mechanics; you won't come to it until several years after you first learn quantum mechanics. However, none of this matters for understanding electromagnetic waves at the level we're discussing in this post, and none of it changes my recommendation that you try to forget that you ever heard the word "photon" for now.

Electromagnetic waves are a classical phenomenon, discovered and well understand decades before either relativity or quantum mechanics, and you understand them by applying classical electrodynamics.

Okay, thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K