Trouble understanding total mechanical energy and the second law of Newton

AI Thread Summary
Total mechanical energy is conserved when considering constant acceleration and the work-energy principle, represented by the equation aΔx = 1/2(v2^2 - v1^2). By multiplying this equation by mass, it becomes FΔx = 1/2(mv2^2 - mv1^2), linking force and displacement. When applying Newton's second law, the net force must account for gravitational forces, leading to F = ma + mg. This adjustment incorporates gravitational potential energy into the energy equation, ensuring consistent results across different approaches. Understanding these relationships clarifies the connection between total mechanical energy and Newton's laws.
studentsuff
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
'Suppose your hand moves upward by 0.50m while you are throwing the ball. The ball leaves your hand with an upward velocity of 20.0 m/s. Find the magnitude of the force (assumed constant) that your hand exerts on the ball. Ignore air resistance.' Now my question is not 'What is the magnitude' but rather: why did I get (roughly) the same answer using F=ma when you were supposed to use the total mechanical energy (W+K1+U1=K2+U2). So I'm more confused about how the 2 formulas are 'related', what the force actually represents in both, when to use what and if there is an actual difference.
Relevant Equations
a = (((v2)^2)-((v2)^2))/(2(x2-x1))
F = m*a
W(other) + K1 + U1 = K2 + U2
F = (K2 + U2 - K1 - U1) / s
Question
 
Physics news on Phys.org
studentsuff said:
Relevant Equations:: a = (((v2)^2)-((v2)^2))/(2(x2-x1))
Since the force is constant so is the acceleration. The above equation for constant acceleration effectively is the work conservation equation; multiply it out to get rid of the division:
##a \Delta x=\frac 12( v_2^2-v_1^2)##
Then multiply by mass:
##ma \Delta x= \frac 12( mv_2^2-mv_1^2)##
Or
##F \Delta x= \frac 12( mv_2^2-mv_1^2)##
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and studentsuff
When using "F = ma", you have to realize that ma is equal to the net force acting on the ball. Since the ball is subject to gravity, to get an acceleration a you have to apply a force F such that
F - mg = ma
F = ma + mg
When you take account of gravity in this way, you find that it is equivalent to accounting for the gravitational potential energy (U2 and U1) in the energy equation. Then you should find you get exactly the same answer (not roughly) using both approaches.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top