Trouble with the definitions of equivalent and collinear.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the definitions of equivalent and collinear vectors, highlighting discrepancies between a teacher's interpretation and textbook definitions. According to the teacher, two parallel vectors with the same magnitude are equivalent, while the textbook states that two vectors in the same direction are equivalent. For collinearity, the textbook defines collinear vectors as those that can be translated to lie on the same line, whereas the teacher asserts that collinear vectors are scalar multiples of each other. The conversation emphasizes that magnitude does not affect collinearity and that the definitions may overlap when considering localized vectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector mathematics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of magnitude and direction
  • Knowledge of scalar multiplication in vector analysis
  • Basic comprehension of localized vectors and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of localized vectors and their significance in physics
  • Study the differences between equivalent vectors and identical vectors
  • Learn about the implications of vector translation in various contexts
  • Explore the mathematical definitions of collinearity in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics and physics, educators clarifying vector concepts, and anyone seeking to resolve ambiguities in vector definitions.

Esoremada
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
My teacher, textbook and the internet have differing definitions.

First of all: Equivalent.

My teacher says that two parallel vectors with the same magnitude are equivalent, but my textbook says that two vectors in the same direction are equivalent.

×-->
<--×

are these equivalent?And Collinear.

I can't find any lesson on collinear vectors online. All the definitions say two points are collinear when they lie on the same line, but nothing about vectors.

My textbook says "Vectors are collinear if they can be translated so that their start and end points lie on the same line"

But my teacher says two vectors are collinear if one is a scalar multiple of the other

So first, to clarify, magnitude has no impact on whether two vectors are collinear?

And second, the textbook definition seems to be describing parallel vectors.

×-->
×----->

Are these collinear? They can be translated to be on the same line.<---×--->

Are these collinear? They are scalar multiples (negative 1) of each other.<---× ×--->

What about these?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Esoremada said:
First of all: Equivalent.

My teacher says that two parallel vectors with the same magnitude are equivalent, but my textbook says that two vectors in the same direction are equivalent.

And Collinear.

My textbook says "Vectors are collinear if they can be translated so that their start and end points lie on the same line"
But my teacher says two vectors are collinear if one is a scalar multiple of the other
I'm not familiar with the term 'equivalent vector'.
The confusion arises because a vector does not have a 'line of action'. It has a magnitude and an orientation only. A force has a line of action, so is more than just its vector representation.
I do see references to 'localized vectors', meaning that the line of action is also specified.

It doesn't mean anything to 'translate' a vector unless you mean localized vectors. You can translate a force by changing its line of action. If you ignore the reference to translation, the two definitions of collinear are the same.

Similarly, if two vectors have the same magnitude and direction they are the same vector, whereas if we're discussing localized vectors then they are merely equivalent, i.e., correspond to the same non-localized vector.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K