Trouble working with LC circuits

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnboyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits Lc
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the operation and experimentation with LC circuits, particularly in relation to using a 60 Hz supply and the implications for transformer performance. Participants explore the effects of frequency changes on circuit behavior and safety considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the formula for the frequency of an LC circuit is 1/2*Pi *Sqrt(LC) and questions the minimum and maximum frequencies that can be used without damaging a transformer.
  • Another participant warns against changing the frequency of a signal through a 60 Hz transformer, citing risks of saturation at lower frequencies and overheating at higher frequencies.
  • Some participants suggest using a signal generator instead of a mains supply for experimentation, emphasizing the limitations of using 60 Hz for varying frequencies.
  • Concerns are raised about the safety of using the AC line for experimentation, with suggestions for safer alternatives like PC audio tone generators.
  • One participant highlights the importance of being able to sweep frequencies to effectively experiment with LC circuits and assess bandwidth and resonance.
  • Another participant mentions that using a 60 Hz supply limits experimentation and could lead to circuit failures, such as smoking components or tripped breakers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a general consensus on the risks associated with using a 60 Hz supply for experimentation, particularly regarding transformer performance and safety. However, there is no consensus on the best approach for conducting experiments, with differing opinions on the use of signal generators versus mains supply.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in using a 60 Hz supply, including the inability to sweep frequencies and the potential for high component costs at lower frequencies. There are also unresolved concerns about the safety and effectiveness of using mains power for experimentation.

johnboyman
Messages
22
Reaction score
2
Hello. I am experimenting with LC Circuits. So far I know that 1/2*Pi *Sqrt(LC) will give you the frequency of the lc cricuit. So when i decide which components to use I can start with that. I was wondering though in a circuit with a 60 hertz supply. What is the minimum and maximum frequencies that i can run in that circuit without it damaging or negatively effecting a transformers performance? If i wanted to raise the frequency above 60 hertz what kind of ways can i use to stop negative feedback? thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
johnboyman said:
Hello. I am experimenting with LC Circuits. So far I know that 1/2*Pi *Sqrt(LC) will give you the frequency of the lc cricuit. So when i decide which components to use I can start with that. I was wondering though in a circuit with a 60 hertz supply. What is the minimum and maximum frequencies that i can run in that circuit without it damaging or negatively effecting a transformers performance? If i wanted to raise the frequency above 60 hertz what kind of ways can i use to stop negative feedback? thanks.
Be careful changing the frequency of the signal you want to put through a "60Hz" transformer. At lower frequencies you will tend to saturate the transformer, and at higher frequencies you will generally experience higher losses and overheating, possibly leading to a fire. Please do not ask me how I know this... :wink:

Why don't you just use your signal generator to drive into your LC experimental circuits, rather than going through a coupling transformer?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Merlin3189
I am trying to learn and perfect my formulas.
 
Why is 60 Hz at all significant? You are presumably not going to connect your circuit directly to an outlet on the wall?
If you are experimenting you should -as Berkeman has already pointed out- use a signal generator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
johnboyman said:
I was wondering though in a circuit with a 60 hertz supply.
It worries me that you are thinking in terms of using the mains as an initial source of signals. For other frequencies, the mains will be of no use. If you want a cheap audio tone source then why not use your PC and audio card? There are many tone generators available on the Web - and all signals would be at a safe level!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Plenty of used signal generator for cheap

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_fr...erator&_sacat=181939&rt=nc&LH_ItemCondition=4

Don't play with the AC line. If you use ac line 60Hz, you are limited to single frequency. Also, as you lower the frequency, the L and C are going to be much higher values and cost a lot more money. With generator, you go higher frequency and get components really cheap. You might save a portion of money buying the components and use on a generator. Generator can be used in the future, your L and C likely go to waste after the experiment.

If you are getting into electronics, get a decent one, it's important to have a signal generator.
 
I forgot to mention last night, even if everything works out, you cannot sweep frequency with line 60Hz. Sweeping frequency is important to experiment with LC circuits to look at the bandwidth. So if you design the 60Hz resonance circuit, then what? You cannot proof the Q or anything. Hell, you can't even proof you are at the center frequency at 60Hz if you cannot change the frequency to sweep to verify.

The only thing you can proof for a series resonance circuit using line 60Hz is when things start smoking or the circuit breaker pops! Remember is the series res. circuit, it's like an open circuit except at the resonance frequency, then the impedance goes very low depends on the Q, it will put a short circuit on the line( or across the stepdown transformer you use).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K