Troubleshooting Enamel Coating for High-Amp Transformer Windings

  • Thread starter Thread starter microfracture
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coating
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of winding a transformer rated for high current (150A or more) and the feasibility of applying an enamel coating to the wire used. Participants explore various materials and methods for insulation and winding configurations, as well as considerations related to electrical losses and heat management in transformer design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using a commercial lacquer for enamel coating the wire, inquiring about availability at local stores.
  • Another participant proposes using aluminum or copper strap instead of wire, along with sheets of insulation like mylar or mylar tape.
  • A different approach mentioned is winding smaller-gauge wire in a multifilar configuration, which may be easier than using a single heavy wire.
  • Concerns are raised about optimizing wire gauge to minimize IR drop and calculating skin-effect losses in solid conductors, with a mention of specific strand counts that may optimize packing fraction.
  • One participant asserts that skin-effect losses are negligible for a power transformer operating at 50 or 60 Hz, while emphasizing the significance of I2R losses.
  • A wire table is referenced that provides current ratings and skin depth, with a note on the limitations of these ratings for transformer windings due to insulation and heat conduction issues.
  • Another participant critiques the ampacity columns in the wire table, arguing they are not suitable for transformer windings and stresses the importance of calculating expected iron and copper losses to avoid overheating.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the best materials and methods for winding the transformer, with no consensus reached on the optimal approach. There are also varying views on the significance of skin-effect losses versus I2R losses, indicating ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in existing wire tables and the need for careful calculations regarding heat management and loss optimization in transformer design. Specific assumptions about cooling conditions and insulation effects are noted but not resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals involved in transformer design, electrical engineering, or those troubleshooting high-current applications in power systems.

microfracture
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
i am winding a transformer rated for 150A or more, and i can't find wire thick enough, in my neighborhood, to fit the profile.
i did find a shop that sells bare wire at 8awg. so i thought i could put an enameled coating on each winding as i wound it. you dig? is there a commercial "lacquer" i can get at say home depot that would fit my needs?

any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Why don't you use aluminum or copper strap instead of wire? Then you could use sheets of insulation (such as mylar or mylar tape).
 
You can also wind smaller-gauge wire in a multifilar configuration. It's also easier to wind this way than a single heavy wire. If you insist, however, you can buy some: http://www.planetengineers.com/product.asp?pid=1703

And the answer to your last question is "no."
 
Do you know what gauge copper wire you need to minimize (optimize) IR drop? Have you calculated skin-effect copper losses for solid conductor? Skin-effect losses in solid copper wire might be another reason to go to individually-enameled stranded wire. By the way, 7-conductor stranded is a magic number of strands, in terms of packing fraction. The next magic number is 19.
 
Assuming this is a power transformer for 50 or 60 Hz, skin-effect losses are entirely negligible at the stated power level, given a skin depth of 8.5 mm at 60 Hz. I2R losses, however, are not.
 
Last edited:
Here is a wire table stating both current rating and skin depth:
http://www.powerstream.com/Wire_Size.htm
It has two amp ratings for each gauge wire. The second column agrees with my ARRL handbook table. There might be another table somewhere for transformer windings, mainly because there is no convection cooling of the wires at all. All the heat is being conducted through insulation, which is a poor heat conductor. Also, the coil has to conduct a lot of the core (transformer lamination) heat loss.
 
Heh, I have that exact table printed out and tacked up on my bulletin board here at work--I'm looking at it right now. Neither of those two ampacity columns is suitable for transformer windings. The first is for free-air chassis wiring where the wires are in open air and separated. The second is for power transmission including in-wall and conduit runs where convective cooling is minimal or nonexistent. and given a conservative 700 CM/A ampacity As you note, for a transformer, you have layers of insulation to deal with plus the heat of iron losses. You have to calculate your expected iron and copper losses and then use these figures to calculate your winding temperature rise; if you don't, you can easily wind up releasing the magic smoke.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K