Truman Henry Safford - Legitimate, and if so, how?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hereandnow672
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Truman Henry Safford is noted for allegedly calculating the square of a large number in under a minute, though this claim may be exaggerated or false. The discussion explores the phenomenon of "human calculators" and their ability to perform rapid mental calculations. It questions the legitimacy of these individuals and whether they are real or mythological. The conversation also references a documentary about Asian children trained with an abacus, showcasing their impressive mental calculation skills. The curiosity surrounding the cognitive abilities of these individuals highlights a broader interest in understanding the human mind.
hereandnow672
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Allow the following to exemplify my curiosity toward how the human mind works:

According to non-cited information via wikipedia.com, Truman Henry Safford is said to have calculated the square of 365,365,365,365,365,365 in less than a minutes time. It should be needless to say that this information may very well be either heavily exaggerated or false to begin with, however, that is not the point. What I'm interested in is how "human calculators" can produce, relatively instantaneously, accurate mental calculations to similar types of problems.

Are these people even real or merely a product of myth? Have any of these people ever attempted to explain how this may be possible?

Does anybody else find the potential answers to these questions as valuable as I do?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hereandnow672 said:
Allow the following to exemplify my curiosity toward how the human mind works:

According to non-cited information via wikipedia.com, Truman Henry Safford is said to have calculated the square of 365,365,365,365,365,365 in less than a minutes time. It should be needless to say that this information may very well be either heavily exaggerated or false to begin with, however, that is not the point. What I'm interested in is how "human calculators" can produce, relatively instantaneously, accurate mental calculations to similar types of problems.

Are these people even real or merely a product of myth? Have any of these people ever attempted to explain how this may be possible?

Does anybody else find the potential answers to these questions as valuable as I do?

There was a video (a documentary) about asian kids that were trained very early with an abacus that by the time they reached about 12 or so, they could do very large calculations in their heads.

I think the documentary is the Boy with the incredible brain:



Scroll half-way into the clip and you will see what I mean. They don't do square roots but you'll see what I mean.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top