Trying to find an alternative for solving an integral

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the attempt to solve an integral using polar coordinates instead of Cartesian coordinates. The original poster expresses confusion about the validity of their polar coordinate approach, particularly regarding the integration limits and the presence of the variable r in the integrand. Responses clarify that the integration setup is flawed, as the upper limit of the r integral is not properly defined and the variable r remains in the integrand without being integrated out. It is suggested that while polar coordinates can be applied, the method used in this case is incorrect. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up integrals when changing coordinate systems.
JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156

Homework Statement



Captura de pantalla (522).png


Homework Equations



Captura de pantalla (524).png


The Attempt at a Solution



Captura de pantalla (528).png

[/B]
I understand how the integral is solved using cartesian coordinates.

However, I wanted to try to solve it using polar coordinates:

$$\int_0^{\pi/2} cos \theta \sqrt{1+r^2 cos^2 \theta}d \theta\int_{0}^{\sqrt{1-r^2 cos^2 \theta}}r^3dr$$

But it doesn't seem to be a good idea.

Am I wrong or we cannot find a better method than cartesian coordinates for solving this integral?
 

Attachments

  • Captura de pantalla (522).png
    Captura de pantalla (522).png
    2.6 KB · Views: 684
  • Captura de pantalla (524).png
    Captura de pantalla (524).png
    6.1 KB · Views: 621
  • Captura de pantalla (528).png
    Captura de pantalla (528).png
    8.7 KB · Views: 998
Physics news on Phys.org
JD_PM said:

Homework Statement



View attachment 240513

Homework Equations



View attachment 240514

The Attempt at a Solution



View attachment 240515
[/B]
I understand how the integral is solved using cartesian coordinates.

However, I wanted to try to solve it using polar coordinates:

$$\int_0^{\pi/2} cos \theta \sqrt{1+r^2 cos^2 \theta}d \theta\int_{0}^{\sqrt{1-r^2 cos^2 \theta}}r^3dr$$

But it doesn't seem to be a good idea.

Am I wrong or we cannot find a better method than cartesian coordinates for solving this integral?

Your last integral with respect to ##r## also has ##r## in the upper limit; that is meaningless. Not only that, your first integrand (for the ##d \theta## integral) still has an ##r## in it, but that ##r## is nowhere integrated out.
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM
Ray Vickson said:
Your last integral with respect to ##r## also has ##r## in the upper limit; that is meaningless. Not only that, your first integrand (for the ##d \theta## integral) still has an ##r## in it, but that ##r## is nowhere integrated out.

Is it meaningless because polar coordinates doesn't apply here or because I made a mistake changing coordinates?
 
JD_PM said:
Is it meaningless because polar coordinates doesn't apply here or because I made a mistake changing coordinates?
Well, let's see: for ##dA = dx \, dy##, ##dA## becomes ##r \, dr \, d \theta## and so
##x \sqrt{1+x^2} \, dA## becomes ## r \cos(\theta) \sqrt{1+r^2 \cos^2(\theta)}\, r \, dr \, d\theta, ## with ##0 \leq r \leq 1## and ##0 \leq \theta \leq \pi/4.## You could do the ##r##-integral (with ##\theta## fixed) to get a function of ##\theta## that would then need to be integrated over ##\theta## from 0 to ##\pi/4##; or, you could do the ##\theta##-integral (with fixed ##r##) to get a function of ##r## that would need integrating from 0 to 1. In either case you would not get what you wrote.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes JD_PM
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K