Trying to find an alternative for solving an integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of an integral using polar coordinates as an alternative to Cartesian coordinates. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the validity of this approach and questions whether polar coordinates can provide a better method for solving the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve the integral using polar coordinates but questions the feasibility of this method compared to Cartesian coordinates. Other participants point out potential issues with the setup of the integrals, particularly regarding the limits and the presence of variables in the integrands.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's approach, providing feedback on the mathematical setup. There is a focus on clarifying the implications of using polar coordinates and the correctness of the integrals presented. No consensus has been reached, but there is constructive dialogue about the issues raised.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the appropriateness of coordinate transformations in the context of the integral, highlighting potential mistakes in the original setup and the implications of those mistakes on the evaluation process.

JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156

Homework Statement



Captura de pantalla (522).png


Homework Equations



Captura de pantalla (524).png


The Attempt at a Solution



Captura de pantalla (528).png

[/B]
I understand how the integral is solved using cartesian coordinates.

However, I wanted to try to solve it using polar coordinates:

$$\int_0^{\pi/2} cos \theta \sqrt{1+r^2 cos^2 \theta}d \theta\int_{0}^{\sqrt{1-r^2 cos^2 \theta}}r^3dr$$

But it doesn't seem to be a good idea.

Am I wrong or we cannot find a better method than cartesian coordinates for solving this integral?
 

Attachments

  • Captura de pantalla (522).png
    Captura de pantalla (522).png
    2.6 KB · Views: 710
  • Captura de pantalla (524).png
    Captura de pantalla (524).png
    6.1 KB · Views: 643
  • Captura de pantalla (528).png
    Captura de pantalla (528).png
    8.7 KB · Views: 1,031
Physics news on Phys.org
JD_PM said:

Homework Statement



View attachment 240513

Homework Equations



View attachment 240514

The Attempt at a Solution



View attachment 240515
[/B]
I understand how the integral is solved using cartesian coordinates.

However, I wanted to try to solve it using polar coordinates:

$$\int_0^{\pi/2} cos \theta \sqrt{1+r^2 cos^2 \theta}d \theta\int_{0}^{\sqrt{1-r^2 cos^2 \theta}}r^3dr$$

But it doesn't seem to be a good idea.

Am I wrong or we cannot find a better method than cartesian coordinates for solving this integral?

Your last integral with respect to ##r## also has ##r## in the upper limit; that is meaningless. Not only that, your first integrand (for the ##d \theta## integral) still has an ##r## in it, but that ##r## is nowhere integrated out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM
Ray Vickson said:
Your last integral with respect to ##r## also has ##r## in the upper limit; that is meaningless. Not only that, your first integrand (for the ##d \theta## integral) still has an ##r## in it, but that ##r## is nowhere integrated out.

Is it meaningless because polar coordinates doesn't apply here or because I made a mistake changing coordinates?
 
JD_PM said:
Is it meaningless because polar coordinates doesn't apply here or because I made a mistake changing coordinates?
Well, let's see: for ##dA = dx \, dy##, ##dA## becomes ##r \, dr \, d \theta## and so
##x \sqrt{1+x^2} \, dA## becomes ## r \cos(\theta) \sqrt{1+r^2 \cos^2(\theta)}\, r \, dr \, d\theta, ## with ##0 \leq r \leq 1## and ##0 \leq \theta \leq \pi/4.## You could do the ##r##-integral (with ##\theta## fixed) to get a function of ##\theta## that would then need to be integrated over ##\theta## from 0 to ##\pi/4##; or, you could do the ##\theta##-integral (with fixed ##r##) to get a function of ##r## that would need integrating from 0 to 1. In either case you would not get what you wrote.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K