Trying to learn topology and with this proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed Quanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Topology
Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
If S is a set with the discrete topology and f:S->T is any transformation of S into a topologized set T, then f is continuous.

Can someone help me prove this? I have no idea where to even begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Def: a map, f, is continuous iff the inverse image of every open set is open. Let U be any subsey of T, f^{-1}(U) is a subset of S. All subsets of S are...?

Just use the definition of continuous
 
intuitively, "f is continuous" means that if x is close to a then f(x) is close to f(a). In a discrete topology, no two different points are ever close together.

So the only requirement for continuity is that, if two points x,a are close, i.e. if they are equal, then the values f(x) and f(a) should be close. That is pretty easy.
 
Ed Quanta said:
If S is a set with the discrete topology and f:S->T is any transformation of S into a topologized set T, then f is continuous.

Can someone help me prove this? I have no idea where to even begin.

Well, you should start with the definition of continuous.

If you can't figure things out from there, here's a hint: Are there any subsets of S that are not open sets in the discrete topology?
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
550
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Back
Top