Trying to reconstruct an accident

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bilbozilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accident
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around reconstructing the circumstances of a vehicle accident using provided data, including initial and final elevations and distance from the roadway. Participants explore calculations related to the vehicle's velocity at the time it left the roadway, considering various assumptions and factors that could influence the outcome.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests to calculate the vehicle's velocity at the moment it left the roadway, providing initial elevation, final elevation, and distance from the roadway.
  • Another participant suggests that a professional accident reconstructor is necessary, criticizing the lack of context and detail in the provided data.
  • A different participant emphasizes that the discussion is a mental exercise for rough calculations and asks for additional variables needed for estimating velocity.
  • One participant argues that the weight of the vehicle is unnecessary for the calculation, focusing instead on the initial height, final height, and distance, while noting the importance of the angle of exit.
  • There is a correction regarding the calculation of fall duration, with one participant asserting a different value for time based on the same formula.
  • Several participants express the need for more context about the accident, particularly regarding the involvement of a tree and its relation to the vehicle's trajectory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the necessary information for the calculations, with some emphasizing the need for additional context while others focus on the mathematical aspects. Disagreements arise regarding the calculations and assumptions made about the scenario.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of detailed information about the accident dynamics, such as the angle of exit and the role of the tree, which could significantly affect the calculations. The discussion relies on idealized conditions without accounting for real-world complexities.

bilbozilla
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

Here's the data I have -

Initial Elevation : 0 feet
Final elevation: -25 feet
Distance from roadway: 55 feet

Assuming the tree that was hit didn't lessen the velocity, and the vehicle didn't bounce, what would the velocity have been at the time the vehicle left the roadway at initial elevation?

How would I calculate the velocity? This is not a homework problem. I've got the totaled car to prove it. (Nobody was hurt) The rear-engine layout caused the vehicle to spin and the car went off rear-first.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, you need a professional accident reconstructor, not some guys you met on the internet.

Second, we knew this wasn't a homework problem. You provided no information on what happened - just three numbers.
 
This is a mental exercise for back-of-the-napkin calculations, nothing more. It is certainly not going to be used for anything other than a brief sanity check.

What other information do you need? I have gravity, which is constant, the height, and the distance. Here are some more numbers.

The weight of the vehicle is 3,100# with driver. I didn't think about that one. What other variables do you need to get a rough estimate (again, just for kicks) of the velocity.
 
Weight of vehicle is not needed. Initial height, final height and distance should be enough to calc velocity. But there are many other factors, such as angle of exit from roadway. However, taking it at face-value, I get:

a = 9.8 m/s^2
d(y) = 7.625m
t=?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_for_a_falling_body#Overview"
t = sqrt(2 x 7.625 / 9.8)
t = 1.247s
This is duration of fall.

To travel 55ft (total displacement, not perpendicluar to roadway) in 1.247s would indicate an initial velocity of 13.45m/s or 48.3kph.

Again, this is an ideal scenario. It is of little use unless the scenario was textbook.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DaveC426913 said:
t = sqrt(2d/g)
t = sqrt(2 x 7.625 / 9.8)
t = 1.556s
This is duration of fall.

I think you forgot to take the square root

sqrt(2 x 7.625 / 9.8) = 1.247
 
What you really need is a description of what happened. Apparently a tree is involved?
 
willem2 said:
I think you forgot to take the square root

sqrt(2 x 7.625 / 9.8) = 1.247

Thanks. Post fixed.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
What you really need is a description of what happened. Apparently a tree is involved?

I'm assuming the tree has marks on it that are 25 vertical feet below the road surface and that the tree is 55 horizontal feet from the spot where the car left the ground.

My assumption is implicit in saying this is a textbook calculation, given nothing but the numbers. If the poster wants to provide more detail, he's welcome to do so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K