Trying to solve a transcendental differential equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a transcendental differential equation derived from A.S. Parnovsky's work. The equation involves constants β, g, and C, and the author suggests using a series expansion of reciprocal powers for approximation. However, an alternative approach proposed is to numerically solve the differential equation, highlighting a potential typo in the integrand of equation 35. Discrepancies in results from Mathematica's integration indicate further investigation is necessary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transcendental differential equations
  • Familiarity with series expansions in mathematical analysis
  • Proficiency in using Mathematica for symbolic computation
  • Knowledge of integral calculus and its applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research numerical methods for solving differential equations
  • Explore series expansion techniques for approximating solutions
  • Learn about error analysis in numerical integration
  • Investigate common pitfalls in symbolic computation with Mathematica
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with complex differential equations, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of numerical methods and symbolic computation.

Portuga
Messages
56
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Solving a Brachistochrone curve with drag.
Relevant Equations
##\vec F = -k \vec v##, ##v = \frac{C}{\sqrt{1 + \left( y^\prime \right)^2}}##
Well, I followed the strategy used by A.S. Parnovsky in his article (\url{http://info.ifpan.edu.pl/firststep/aw-works/fsV/parnovsky/parnovsky.pdf}) and found this differential equation: $$-\frac{g x}{C^{2}} = -\frac{\beta^{2} {y^{\prime}}^{2} \arctan\left({y^{\prime}}\right) + \beta {y^{\prime}}^{2} \log\left({y^{\prime}}^{2} + 1\right) - 2 \, \beta {y^{\prime}}^{2} \log\left(\beta - {y^{\prime}}\right) - \beta^{3} - \beta^{2} {y^{\prime}} + \beta^{2} \arctan\left({y^{\prime}}\right) - {y^{\prime}}^{2} \arctan\left({y^{\prime}}\right) + \beta \log\left({y^{\prime}}^{2} + 1\right) - 2 \, \beta \log\left(\beta - {y^{\prime}}\right) - \beta - {y^{\prime}} - \arctan\left({y^{\prime}}\right)}{2 \, {\left(\beta^{2} + 1\right)}^{2} {\left({y^{\prime}}^{2} + 1\right)}},$$ where ##\beta, g## and ##C## are constants.
The problem is: how to proceed? This is clearly an transcendental equation for ##y^\prime## and the autor didn't solve it explicitly. He purposed the use of a series expansion of reciprocal powers, but I was imagining if this was the most reasonable way to do it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
Physics news on Phys.org
Closed-form solutions are few and far between. Anything that gets a little complicated (and this example is very complicated) can not be expected to have a simple closed-form solution. I suspect that the use of a series expansion is the most practical way to get a closed-form approximation to any desired accuracy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Portuga
Portuga said:
but I was imagining if this was the most reasonable way to do it.

I believe the most reasonable way to handle this is to numerically solve the DE. However, before doing this, looks like he made a typo in eqn 35 in the denominator of integrand. Should it not be (where I use x for y'):
$$
\int \frac{x}{(1+x^2)^2(x-\beta)}dx
$$
And even when I just try to solve the integral in Mathematica, the answers do not agree:

[CODE title="Mathematica"]expA=Integrate[x /((1+x^2)^2(x-\[Beta])),x]//Apart
expB=(x+\[Beta])/(2(1+x^2)(1+\[Beta]^2))+
(1-\[Beta]^2)/(2(1+\[Beta]^2)^2) (ArcTan[x]-Pi/2)+
\[Beta]/(2(1+\[Beta]^2)^2) Log[(x-\[Beta])^2/(1+x^2)]

expA===expB

expA/.{x->1,\[Beta]->0.5}
expB/.{x->1,\[Beta]->0.5}

False

0.155785

-0.221206
[/CODE]

Would have to resolve these issues first .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Portuga

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K