Trying to solve complex equation with 1 variable,

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a complex equation for the variable x, which is intended to represent the radius of the Milky Way's dark matter halo. The equation involves logarithmic and algebraic components, and the original poster expresses a desire to find a numerical solution rather than a derivation of the equation itself.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of using iterative methods to find a solution, as a straightforward algebraic solution seems unlikely. Some suggest graphing the function to visualize potential solutions, while others express uncertainty about interpreting the results of such graphs.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different methods to approach the problem, including suggestions to use software tools like WolframAlpha for graphing. Some participants have attempted to reformulate the equation to facilitate solving, and there are indications of multiple interpretations regarding the relationships between variables.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as the lack of access to mathematical software and the complexity of the equation derived from astrophysical principles. There is also mention of expected values for x, which adds context to the discussion but does not resolve the underlying uncertainties.

QuantumX
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Guys, could you please help me solve this equation for x:

220000=\sqrt{1.4*10^{32}*\left[ln(\frac{6.17*10^{20}+x}{6.17*10^{20}})-\frac{x}{6.17*10^{20}+x}\right]*\frac{1}{x}}

It's supposed to give me the radius of the Milky Way's dark matter halo. I expect to get a value of around 100 kpc (equation will produce a value in m), although that would assume I didn't mess up anywhere in deriving it.

Please don't ask me to show you how I derived it, I mean we can do that, but right now I'd really just like to get a value for x. I just can't solve it myself, and all online calculators I've tried it on have failed.

Can you please help me solve it, it took me all day to get here and now I can't get the actual value.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show us what steps you've already taken. If you are looking for a totally algebraic solution, where you get x = some number, that doesn't appear to be in the cards. It'll probably take an iterative method to find x.
 
QuantumX said:

Homework Statement



Guys, could you please help me solve this equation for x:

220000=\sqrt{1.4*10^{32}*\left[ln(\frac{6.17*10^{20}+x}{6.17*10^{20}})-\frac{x}{6.17*10^{20}+x}\right]*\frac{1}{x}}

It's supposed to give me the radius of the Milky Way's dark matter halo. I expect to get a value of around 100 kpc (equation will produce a value in m), although that would assume I didn't mess up anywhere in deriving it.

Please don't ask me to show you how I derived it, I mean we can do that, but right now I'd really just like to get a value for x. I just can't solve it myself, and all online calculators I've tried it on have failed.

Can you please help me solve it, it took me all day to get here and now I can't get the actual value.

Thanks!
Graph the function.
 
I can't, I don't have any sort of math software, even if I did I doubt it would do it haha.

It 's supposed to be a value, but I can see how it would be impossible to get from this.

Still, any help is appreciated.
 
QuantumX said:
I can't, I don't have any sort of math software, even if I did I doubt it would do it haha.

It 's supposed to be a value, but I can see how it would be impossible to get from this.

Still, any help is appreciated.
Try WolframAlpha .
 
Basically, the way I derived it (and this may now be more appropriate for the astrophysics section)

is by using the equation

V=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{R}}

I want to estimate the point at which orbital velocity and mass are no longer linearly related. The velocity of the flat portion of the Milky Way's rotation curve is around 220,000m/s. I am looking for a radius Rmax at which the orbital velocity drops off, and that would be the edge of the dark matter halo.

So I have V, I'm looking for R and I now need M to substitute in the above equation.

M=4/3\pi r^3ρ(r)

Integrating:

M=∫ 4 \pi r^2ρ(r)dr = 4\pi ρ_{0}Rs^3[ln(\frac{Rs + Rmax}{Rs}) - \frac{Rmax}{Rs+Rmax}]

I have values for ρ(0) and Rs (those are constants for our galaxy)

So substituting everything, I get the equation you see.
 
@SammyS - Thank you so much, that worked. I got a graph, but I'm not sure how to interpret it...

Here's the equation in a form that works for WolframAlpha

220000=sqrt(1.4*10^32*(ln((6.17*10^20+x)/(6.17*10^20))- (x/(6.17*10^20+x))*(1/x))

Yeah, I guess it's a function because the radius is a function of the density, but I thought for some reason that problem would be solved by the fact I had the density constants for our galaxy. I wish WolframAlpha would show me more of the graph, so I can see where it gets near flat, that's what I'll call x for my estimate.

I just totally have no idea what I'm doing haha, but it's been fun.
 
QuantumX said:
@SammyS - Thank you so much, that worked. I got a graph, but I'm not sure how to interpret it...

Here's the equation in a form that works for WolframAlpha

220000=sqrt(1.4*10^32*(ln((6.17*10^20+x)/(6.17*10^20))- (x/(6.17*10^20+x))*(1/x))

Yeah, I guess it's a function because the radius is a function of the density, but I thought for some reason that problem would be solved by the fact I had the density constants for our galaxy. I wish WolframAlpha would show me more of the graph, so I can see where it gets near flat, that's what I'll call x for my estimate.

I just totally have no idea what I'm doing haha, but it's been fun.
Well, you could change x to units of pc or kpc. (I assume x is in meters.)

Or try this for the given expression. (I divided both sides or your equation by 220000 then subtracted 1.) https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+%281.18322%2F220000%29*10%5E16+sqrt%28%28-x%2F%286.17x10%5E20%2Bx%29%2Blog%281.62075x10%5E-21+%286.17x10%5E20%2Bx%29%29%29%2Fx%29-1+for+x+from+8*10%5E20+to+2+*+10%5E21
 
QuantumX said:

Homework Statement



Guys, could you please help me solve this equation for x:

220000=\sqrt{1.4*10^{32}*\left[ln(\frac{6.17*10^{20}+x}{6.17*10^{20}})-\frac{x}{6.17*10^{20}+x}\right]*\frac{1}{x}}

It's supposed to give me the radius of the Milky Way's dark matter halo. I expect to get a value of around 100 kpc (equation will produce a value in m), although that would assume I didn't mess up anywhere in deriving it.

Please don't ask me to show you how I derived it, I mean we can do that, but right now I'd really just like to get a value for x. I just can't solve it myself, and all online calculators I've tried it on have failed.

Can you please help me solve it, it took me all day to get here and now I can't get the actual value.

Thanks!
Let y = x /6.17 x 1020
Then:
220000=\sqrt{\frac{2.27\times 10^{11}}{y}*\left[ln(1+y)-\frac{y}{1+y}\right]}
Square both sides:
0.213=\left[\frac{ln(1+y)}{y}-\frac{1}{1+y}\right]
The solution to this equation is approximately y = 1.5.

Chet
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Hm, well I'm not sure how to interpret yours.

When I look at mine:

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/...0+x)/(6.17*10^20))-+(x/(6.17*10^20+x))*(1/x))

I see that the curve for x ends right at 3.75*10^21 m = 121.5 kpc, which is within the range of current estimates for the radius of the galaxy (the dark matter halo that is).

That's just an observation, I' not sure how to read the graph honestly. Does the curve end where the graph ends, or does it continue?

I know that x is radius, but what is y ? Is it density? That wouldn't make sense, since density is in kg/m^3, which would be way too much according to the graph for that radius.

Sorry for the super newbie questions.
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
Let y = x /6.17 x 1020
Then:
220000=\sqrt{\frac{2.27\times 10^{11}}{y}*\left[ln(1+y)-\frac{y}{1+y}\right]}
Square both sides:
0.213=\left[\frac{ln(1+y)}{y}-\frac{1}{1+y}\right]
The solution to this equation is approximately y = 1.5.

Chet

Hm, that only gives 30 kpc for the radius, it's supposed to be around 10 times that.
 
  • #12
QuantumX said:
Hm, that only gives 30 kpc for the radius, it's supposed to be around 10 times that.
Sorry about that. Substitute the result, and see if it satisfies your equation.

Chet
 
  • #13
That's what I did, it's off by a factor of 10, but I'm sure the error is in my calculations somewhere.

Thanks for your help.
 
  • #14
Chestermiller said:
Let y = x /6.17 x 1020
Then:
220000=\sqrt{\frac{2.27\times 10^{11}}{y}*\left[ln(1+y)-\frac{y}{1+y}\right]}
Square both sides:
0.213=\left[\frac{ln(1+y)}{y}-\frac{1}{1+y}\right]
The solution to this equation is approximately y = 1.5.

Chet
Here's the WA graph for ##\displaystyle \left[\frac{ln(1+y)}{y}-\frac{1}{1+y}\right]- 0.213 ##

attachment.php?attachmentid=67345&stc=1&d=1394166341.gif


So, there are two solutions.
 

Attachments

  • MSP6837204i5gah909e2bed000027908ci7he0c87e5.gif
    MSP6837204i5gah909e2bed000027908ci7he0c87e5.gif
    2.7 KB · Views: 546

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
870
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K