Trying to Understand Light in Motion: A Frustrating Puzzle

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsLaura
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Motion Puzzle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of light in a moving train scenario, particularly focusing on how light from two flashes reaches a passenger on the train. Participants explore the implications of relativity, synchronization of events, and the mathematical framework involved in analyzing the situation. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and conceptual clarification.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how light from two flashes can reach a passenger on a moving train at the same time, suggesting a need for equations to clarify the situation.
  • Another participant describes a setup involving sensors and a light source, detailing the four-velocity and the calculations needed to determine when light reaches each sensor, indicating that synchronization affects the results.
  • A participant requests clarification on the terms gamma and beta used in the context of four-velocity, indicating a need for visual aids to understand the concepts better.
  • One participant provides a simplified table to illustrate the positions of the train and light over time, suggesting that light reaches the front of the train at a specific time based on their calculations.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the scenario involves two different frames of reference, arguing that the timing of light reaching the passenger depends on whether the flashes are emitted simultaneously in the passenger's or the ground's rest frame.
  • A participant asserts that light must hit the passenger at the same time in all directions, referencing the constancy of the speed of light and suggesting that length contraction may play a role in the scenario.
  • One participant introduces the concept of light cone diagrams to illustrate the relationship between events in different frames, indicating that the angles of the coordinates change in moving frames.
  • There is a disagreement regarding the interpretation of simultaneity in the context of relativity, with some participants arguing that the light from both flashes cannot reach the passenger at the same time under certain conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the light from both flashes can hit the passenger at the same time, as there are competing views based on different frames of reference and interpretations of simultaneity in relativity.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of synchronizing events in different reference frames and the mathematical intricacies involved in analyzing the motion of light relative to moving observers. Some assumptions about synchronization and the nature of light propagation remain unresolved.

  • #391


solarflare said:
this was posted to show the videos worldline
Once again, you have switched scenarios. This diagram is for the standard scenario in which the lightning strikes are simultaneous in the platform frame.

the strikes are along the X axis both at t = 0
Yes, in the platform frame.

as they occur on the train - they must be simultaneous
The fact that they occur 'on the train' is irrelevant. They are simultaneous in the platform frame, not the train frame.

the light then travels from the sources to the platform observer at t = 4
Sure, it takes time for the light to travel to the platform observer.

the lines also cross the t prime axis but the x prime line is not used to show where they cross on the t prime line
You should be able to draw in the lines to see where and when the events (the lightning strikes) happen in the train frame.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #392


it is not irrelevant when the graph says they occur on the train simultaneously

and again the lines cross t prime from the source on the x-axis

if you want to say that t prime is relevant then the source of the lines that cross t prime must also be relevant
 
  • #393


This thread is obviously going nowhere (and very slowly at that). So it's time to shut it down.

Solarflare: All your questions have been answered several times over. Repeating the same thing isn't going to help. If you're serious, I suggest getting an intro book on relativity. (Or you can read Einstein's own words--see George's link.) Then you can go back and read through this thread again.

Thanks to everyone who contributed their time and effort to this thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K