Turning on a flashlight at 98 of c

  • Thread starter Thread starter hellfire695
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Turning
AI Thread Summary
When traveling at 98% of the speed of light (c) and turning on a flashlight, the light beam still travels at c relative to the observer, not at a combined speed of 98% c plus the speed of light. From the perspective of someone in the spaceship, they are stationary, and everything else appears to move past them at 98% c. However, due to the effects of relativity, if an object is thrown forward at 98% c, an outside observer would measure it moving at a speed less than c, specifically around 99.5% c. This discrepancy arises because the laws of physics dictate that the speed of light remains constant for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. The key takeaway is that time dilation occurs, meaning time passes slower for those traveling at relativistic speeds compared to stationary observers.
hellfire695
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is my first post so if i made any noob mistakes have at me

I can best formulate my question in the form of this
If I'm driving a car at 100kph, and someone the kleenex box form the back seat at 30kph, then it moves at 30kph relative to me but in actuality is moving at something like 130kph

now if i was in a vehicle that travel at 98% of c, and I turned on a flashlight then would the only be traveling at 2% faster then me? is my understanding correct, and what kind of effects would I see/feel
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi there
welcome to PF :)

hellfire695 said:
Hi, this is my first post so if i made any noob mistakes have at me

I can best formulate my question in the form of this
If I'm driving a car at 100kph, and someone the kleenex box form the back seat at 30kph, then it moves at 30kph relative to me but in actuality is moving at something like 130kph

its only moving at 130kph relative to someone at rest and not in the car
to everyone in the car it is moving forward at 30kph

hellfire695 said:
...now if i was in a vehicle that travel at 98% of c, and I turned on a flashlight then would the only be traveling at 2% faster then me? is my understanding correct, and what kind of effects would I see/feel


no, because in your timeframe you are at rest and the light from the flashlight is still traveling away from you at its normal velocity, c.
Its only when some one else, in their time frame, views you and your spaceship do they see you traveling at 98% c. From your point if view, you are stationary and everything else is moving past you at 98% c.
And even then, the beam of light from the flashlight is still moving at only c, NOT c + your velocity.
( that's for reasons tied up in relativity, that I'm not well versed on ;) )

hopefully that made sense :)

cheers
Dave
 
Last edited:
thanks that did make some sense but I want to clarify something.
I was under the impression even in I'm at rest in the car, for purposes of total energy I am moving at 100 kph. thus
Now as I understand that Kleenex box has to travel at 130 relative to a person at rest in order to appear to travel at 30kph compared to me?
 
You are correct. At these speeds you can simply add and subtract the velocities. However, if you apply relativity, you will find that the the cleenex box is actually moving just a bit off of but not exactly 130 kph. Probably too little to even measure.

As you get closer to the speed of light though, it is quite measurable and quite pronounced, such that if you're traveling at 98% c and throw a kleenex box forward at 98% c, an outside observer will measure the kleenex box as moving only perhaps 99.5% c (I don't know the exact number...too much of a layman). But never c or never more than c.

Now, obviously if the velocities don't simply add up, something else has to give. That something else is time. The clock actually ticks slower for you, traveling at 98% c than it does for the outside observer.

This also means that c is always c for everybody, whether they are on Earth or on a almost-at-the-speed-of-light spaceship. The differences will be in how fast their clocks tick. For an actual light beam, the clock stops.
 
Look up relativistic "velocity addition":

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/%E2%80%8Chbase/relativ/einvel.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top