Turns / Core size optimization for Transformer

In summary: N*A. However, it seems like we can choose N and A arbitrarily. Why not use a tiny core A and huge N if that saves money. Or the other way round if that saves money.In summary, the optimum choice would be to use a tiny core and huge N if it saves money.
  • #1
I_am_learning
682
16
Say, I want to design, 220 / 12 V 100VA transformer.
We have
V = 4.4BfNA (V is applied voltage RMS, B is peak flux Density, N is no. of turns, f is frequency, A is core cross section)
so, B = V / (4.4 f NA)

If i use iron core, there is limit to the maximum value of B without excessive saturation losses. So there is constraint for the minimum value for N*A.

But seems like we can choose N and A arbitrarily. Why not use a tiny core A and huge N if that saves money. Or the other way round if that saves money.
Whats the optimum choice?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
In theory, using ideal components, there are a lot of things we can do with inductors and capacitors. In reality it is very difficult to find these ideal components. In the question about your transformer, you need to consider the Iron Losses, the impedance and the resistance in your primary in an effort to minimize no-load, nominal load and full load losses. This has been done exhaustively.

The more modern approach to limiting the costs associate with transformers is to increase frequency and manipulate duty cycle. That is, rectify the line voltage, and then use a switch (BJT, FET, IGBT) to send pulses to the transformer at switching speeds from a few kHz to hundreds of kHz. While more complicated than a simple line transformer/rectifier, the product is typically much more efficient and considerably less expensive.

Fish
 
  • #3
Here is a list of things you need to review

What is iron core shape? toroid, window frame, pot core, etc.?

1) core loss (hysteresis) ===> Bmax
2) lamination loss (eddy currents)===> lamination thickness or ferrite
3) copper loss (coil resistance (primary and secondary))
4) coil primary inductance (power factor stuff)

Note: Low core cross section and high N creates large coil cross section and high inductance primary.

From this you will calculate
5) N turns (primary)
6) core cross section A
7) geometry (autotransformer or isolated secondary)
8) Center tapped secondary? (for full wave CT vs. full wave bridge)
7) wire gauge (primary and secondary)
8) core loss watts
9) eddy current loss watts
10) copper loss watts

What is secondary circuit?
If you are rectifying this using single phase, you need extra copper for a capacitor-input filter because of surge current every half cycle.

What do you need to minimize/mazimize?
Total power loss (watts)?
Total size (volume)
total weight (grams)
Total cost (core, copper, etc.)?

One modern approach is a "transformerless" design
Directly rectify primary power and generate high voltage dc
Use high efficiency dc-dc converter design

Bob S
 

1. What is the purpose of optimizing turns and core size for a transformer?

The optimization of turns and core size for a transformer is important because it helps to improve the efficiency and performance of the transformer. By finding the optimal number of turns and appropriate core size, the transformer can operate at its maximum efficiency, reducing energy losses and increasing its lifespan.

2. How are turns and core size optimized for a transformer?

Turns and core size are optimized through mathematical calculations and simulations. Factors such as the desired voltage and current levels, core material properties, and frequency are taken into account to determine the optimal number of turns and core size for a given transformer design.

3. What are the benefits of optimizing turns and core size for a transformer?

Some of the benefits of optimizing turns and core size for a transformer include increased efficiency, reduced energy losses, improved voltage regulation, and better performance under varying load conditions. It can also lead to a more compact and cost-effective transformer design.

4. Can turns and core size optimization be applied to any type of transformer?

Yes, turns and core size optimization can be applied to various types of transformers, including power transformers, distribution transformers, and instrument transformers. The principles and techniques used may vary depending on the type and purpose of the transformer, but the overall goal of improving efficiency and performance remains the same.

5. Are there any limitations to optimizing turns and core size for a transformer?

While optimizing turns and core size can greatly improve the performance of a transformer, there are some limitations to consider. These include factors such as material availability, manufacturing constraints, and cost considerations. Additionally, the optimization process may require multiple iterations to find the most optimal solution, which can be time-consuming.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
860
Replies
4
Views
985
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top