Two blocks kept side by side and friction between them

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of two blocks with one block (mass m) resting on another (mass M) and the effects of applied force and friction. It is established that if the applied force exceeds a certain threshold, the frictional force can increase, but it will not be sufficient to overcome gravity and cause block m to accelerate upwards. The participants clarify that friction acts to oppose motion, and thus, while the maximum static frictional force can increase, it will not exceed the gravitational force acting on block m. Additionally, altering the angle of the surface could theoretically allow for upward movement under specific conditions. Ultimately, the consensus is that block m cannot move upwards due to the limitations of friction in this scenario.
Hamiltonian
Messages
296
Reaction score
193
Homework Statement
in the given figure a force F I applied on a block of mass M and the coefficient of friction(u) between the two blocks of mass M and m is u. the surface on which the block of mass M is kept is smooth. for a force F > g(M+m)/u will the block of mass m move upward
Relevant Equations
f = ma
frict between blocks.jpeg
if the applied force F >(M+m)g/##\mu## the force of friction between the two blocks should become f=N##\mu## and since the normal reaction will be greater than what it should be to keep the block m at rest with respect to M, will the mass m accelerate upwards.

in short,for let's say a very large F can the block of mass m overcome the force of gravity and move upwards due to the force of friction between them. as f=N##\mu## and as the force F increase N also increases and at some time the force of friction f will become grater than mg.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction always acts to oppose motion between surfaces. If there were enough friction to move the mass upwards, there would be enough friction to resist that motion!
 
@Hamiltonian299792458 , You appear to be making the classic error of confusing the maximum static frictional force, ##\mu_sN##, with the actual frictional force.
 
PeroK said:
Friction always acts to oppose motion between surfaces. If there were enough friction to move the mass upwards, there would be enough friction to resist that motion!
so its impossible for block m to move upward
 
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
so its impossible for block m to move upward
Why wouldn't friction move it downward instead? Or sideways?
 
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
so its impossible for block m to move upward
There is no reason for it to move upward. The actual frictional force will never exceed the force needed to prevent relative motion of the surfaces, in this case mg.
 
As mentioned, friction will not do the trick. But you could alter the problem so that the right face of the block is slightly less steep than vertical. In the box frame, the inertial force will have a small component parallel to the plane, which must oppose both the components of friction and gravity parallel to the plane if it is to slide upward.
 
ok i think i understand my mistake, as N increases that's just increase the maximum frictional force and not the force that is acting in the given case
 
etotheipi said:
As mentioned, friction will not do the trick. But you could alter the problem so that the right face of the block is slightly less steep than vertical. In the box frame, the inertial force will have a small component parallel to the plane, which must oppose both the components of friction and gravity parallel to the plane if it is to slide upward.
.. and the question posed might then be what the maximum angle of the face to the vertical is such that, at sufficient applied force, m will slide upwards.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
  • #10
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
ok i think i understand my mistake, as N increases that's just increase the maximum frictional force and not the force that is acting in the given case
You need to remember this because you've gone wrong on several problems now with this idea.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
971
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
61
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K