Two blocks sliding past each other

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two blocks, a 3.0kg block on top of a 5.0kg block, connected by a string over a pulley. The setup is on a horizontal surface, and the goal is to determine the minimum force required to move both blocks, considering static and kinetic friction coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations of motion for the blocks, including the forces acting on both the top and bottom blocks. There is an exploration of the correct friction coefficients to use, with some questioning whether kinetic or static friction should apply.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the equations and forces involved, with some corrections noted regarding the friction forces. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the forces and the conditions for movement, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is also a noted confusion regarding the application of friction coefficients based on the state of motion of the blocks.

chiddler
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 3.0kg block sits on top of a 5.0kg block which is on a horizontal surface. The two blocks are connected by a string; the string connects the top to the bottom with a pulley. The 5.0kg block is pulled to the right with a force. The coefficient of static friction between all surfaces is 0.55 and the kinetic coefficient is 0.36. (I attached figure)

What is the minimum value of needed to move the two blocks?

Homework Equations


Sum forces = ma


The Attempt at a Solution


So, from the free body diagram I drew up, I wrote this equation for the block on the bottom:

F - T - Ff = ma

F is force, T is tension from string, Ff is friction force. I set ma = 0 since I am finding the lowest amount of force for movement to occur.

To find T, I look at the top block:

T - Ff = ma = 0

T is tension, Ff = 0.36 * 3 * 9.8 = 10.6

So T = 10.6 N; ok now I have T. Now I need to find friction of the bottom block.

Ff = u * Fn (normal force)
Ff = 0.55 * (mg + force from top block)
Ff = 0.55 * (5*9.8 + 3*9.8)
Ff = 43.12

Summing it all together:

F - T - Ff = 0
F - 10.6 - 43.12 = 0
F = 32.5 N. Which is wrong :(

I've spent a good 1.5 hours trying to spot my mistake. I'm angrier than a white supremist in africa right now; please help!
 

Attachments

  • GIANCOLI.ch05.p031.jpg
    GIANCOLI.ch05.p031.jpg
    3.4 KB · Views: 1,927
Physics news on Phys.org
chiddler said:

Homework Statement


A 3.0kg block sits on top of a 5.0kg block which is on a horizontal surface. The two blocks are connected by a string; the string connects the top to the bottom with a pulley. The 5.0kg block is pulled to the right with a force. The coefficient of static friction between all surfaces is 0.55 and the kinetic coefficient is 0.36. (I attached figure)

What is the minimum value of needed to move the two blocks?

Homework Equations


Sum forces = ma


The Attempt at a Solution


So, from the free body diagram I drew up, I wrote this equation for the block on the bottom:

F - T - Ff = ma

F is force, T is tension from string, Ff is friction force. I set ma = 0 since I am finding the lowest amount of force for movement to occur.
In your FBD of the bottom block, you are missing a force that acts on the block in the horizontal direction.
To find T, I look at the top block:

T - Ff = ma = 0

T is tension, Ff = 0.36 * 3 * 9.8 = 10.6

So T = 10.6 N; ok now I have T. Now I need to find friction of the bottom block.
Why are you using the kinetic friction coefficient? Is either block moving?
Ff = u * Fn (normal force)
Ff = 0.55 * (mg + force from top block)
Ff = 0.55 * (5*9.8 + 3*9.8)
Ff = 43.12
Yes, this is the friction between the horizontal surface and the lower block.
Summing it all together:

F - T - Ff = 0
F - 10.6 - 43.12 = 0
F = 32.5 N. Which is wrong :(

I've spent a good 1.5 hours trying to spot my mistake. I'm angrier than a white supremist in africa right now; please help!
Please make corrections and resubmit.
 
PhanthomJay said:
In your FBD of the bottom block, you are missing a force that acts on the block in the horizontal direction. Why are you using the kinetic friction coefficient? Is either block moving? Yes, this is the friction between the horizontal surface and the lower block. Please make corrections and resubmit.

Hey thank you for the assistance.

1. I must have forgotten the friction force of the top block exerted on the bottom block. Is that right?

2. I use kinetic friction coefficient because the top block and bottom block will both be moving, when force is exerted, no? I read that kinetic friction coefficient is for an object that is in motion and static is for when it is at rest. Well...they do start at rest. Is that my error?

3. Ok. So now, assuming my #1 is correct, I will rewrite it as:

F - T - Ff - Ff2 = mg = 0

Where Ff2 is the force of friction that the top block exerts on the bottom block. Is this correct?

If so, is Ff2 simply Ff2 = u * Fn = 0.55 * 3 * 9.8

?
 
chiddler said:
Hey thank you for the assistance.

1. I must have forgotten the friction force of the top block exerted on the bottom block. Is that right?
That is correct.
2. I use kinetic friction coefficient because the top block and bottom block will both be moving, when force is exerted, no? I read that kinetic friction coefficient is for an object that is in motion and static is for when it is at rest. Well...they do start at rest. Is that my error?
Yes. They cannot move with respect to each other or with respect to the ground until static friction beteeen them and between the lower block and ground is overcome.
3. Ok. So now, assuming my #1 is correct, I will rewrite it as:

F - T - Ff - Ff2 = mg you mean ma, right?[/color] = 0

Where Ff2 is the force of friction that the top block exerts on the bottom block. Is this correct?
Yes again..
If so, is Ff2 simply Ff2 = u * Fn = 0.55 * 3 * 9.8

?
Yes, again you are correct! Continue...while you're on a roll..:smile:
 
So then:

F - T - Ff - Ff2 = 0

F - 10.6 - 43.12 - (0.55)(3)(9.8) = 48.69 N.

Which is also incorrect lol

Can you see if I missed anything?
 
chiddler said:
So then:

F - T - Ff - Ff2 = 0

F - 10.6 - 43.12 - (0.55)(3)(9.8) = 48.69 N.

Which is also incorrect lol

Can you see if I missed anything?
In calculating T, you used the wrong friction coefficient.
 
Thanks i got it; very useful!

Too late though :(
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K