MHB Two circles intersecting, a lot of lines.

  • Thread starter Thread starter caffeinemachine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circles Lines
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the geometric relationship between two intersecting circles, T1 and T2, and the angles formed by tangents and intersecting lines. Participants express confusion about the tangents and the order of points, questioning whether the tangent from point A to T2 must intersect T1. A figure is shared to clarify the relationships, but doubts remain about the angle measurements and their validity. The suggestion to use Geometer's Sketchpad for further exploration is made, with one participant noting that the problem holds true if point B is positioned between points A and D. The conversation concludes with the acknowledgment that the result may still apply under different conditions, particularly regarding the interpretation of angles.
caffeinemachine
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
799
Reaction score
15
Let two circles $T_1$ and $T_2$, ($T_1$ is smaller than $T_2$), intersect at points $C$ and $E$. Let the tangent to $T_1$ at $C$ meet $T_2$ at $A$. From $A$ another tangent to $T_1$ is drawn which touches $T_1$ at $B$ and meets $T_2$ again at $D$. Let $F$ be the foot of perpendicular from $B$ to $CD$. $\angle CDB=x$. Show that $\angle DEF=2x$.

Drawing some figures to scale, I found that if $CD$ meets $T_1$ at $G$, then $\angle FEG=\angle GED$ although I am not able to prove this or solve the main question above.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
caffeinemachine said:
Let two circles $T_1$ and $T_2$, ($T_1$ is smaller than $T_2$), intersect at points $C$ and $E$. Let the tangent to $T_1$ at $C$ meet $T_2$ at $A$.

With you so far.

From $A$ another tangent to $T_1$

Did you mean a tangent to $T_{2}$? Or is $A=C$?

is drawn which touches $T_1$ at $B$

The tangent to $T_{2}$ at $A$ is by no means guaranteed to intersect $T_{1}$. Or is it postulated that it must?

and meets $T_2$ again at $D$. Let $F$ be the foot of perpendicular from $B$ to $CD$. $\angle CDB=x$. Show that $\angle DEF=2x$.

Drawing some figures to scale, I found that if $CD$ meets $T_1$ at $G$, then $\angle FEG=\angle GED$ although I am not able to prove this or solve the main question above.

I am confused, I'm afraid. Could you please help me out here?
 
Ackbach said:
With you so far.
Did you mean a tangent to $T_{2}$? Or is $A=C$?
The tangent to $T_{2}$ at $A$ is by no means guaranteed to intersect $T_{1}$. Or is it postulated that it must?
I am confused, I'm afraid. Could you please help me out here?
Okay let me upload a figure here.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0170.PNG
    IMG_0170.PNG
    8.3 KB · Views: 88
The picture does indeed help. However, I'm not sure I buy the result. Try drawing the figure again with hardly any overlap of the two circles. I end up with, for example, the points $ADB$ showing up in that order, not in the order of $ABD$. And the angle $\angle DEF$ sure looks a lot smaller than $\angle CDB$.
 
Ackbach said:
The picture does indeed help. However, I'm not sure I buy the result. Try drawing the figure again with hardly any overlap of the two circles. I end up with, for example, the points $ADB$ showing up in that order, not in the order of $ABD$. And the angle $\angle DEF$ sure looks a lot smaller than $\angle CDB$.
I guess you are right. I don't know what's going on here. Perhaps an additional constraint should be imposed... that ABD occur in this order only.
 
Try constructing the drawing in something like Geometer's Sketchpad, and see if you can find anything out. GSP allows lots of experimentation by dragging things around and generally having fun.
 
Ackbach said:
Try constructing the drawing in something like Geometer's Sketchpad, and see if you can find anything out. GSP allows lots of experimentation by dragging things around and generally having fun.
Thank you for telling me about this software. I will download its trial version as soon as I can. Meanwhile I checked(using ruler and compass :() that if B is between A and D then the problem makes sense.
 
caffeinemachine said:
Thank you for telling me about this software. I will download its trial version as soon as I can. Meanwhile I checked(using ruler and compass :() that if B is between A and D then the problem makes sense.
I have not made any progress with this problem, but I suspect that the result is still true when B is not between A and D, provided that you interpret it correctly. In that case, you should take the angle $x$ to be $\angle CDA$, which will be obtuse. Then $2x$ will be greater than $180^\circ$ and you need to take the reflex angle $\angle DEF$.
 
Back
Top