Two current carrying wires. Confusion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interaction between two current-carrying wires and the magnetic fields they produce. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the behavior of the magnetic field in the region between the wires, particularly questioning how the magnetic field can be zero at a midpoint while still exhibiting non-zero values elsewhere.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of the magnetic field produced by each wire and question the implications of the right-hand rule. There are attempts to visualize the magnetic field lines and clarify the conditions under which the field is zero.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications about the magnetic field's behavior. Some guidance has been offered regarding the specific locations where the magnetic field is zero, but multiple interpretations and questions remain active.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through various assumptions about the magnetic field's behavior and the application of the right-hand rule. There is mention of potential confusion arising from different interpretations of the rules governing magnetic fields around current-carrying wires.

flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let there be two current carrying wires with current flowing in the same direction. According to my book, they attract by the right hand rule. Now here is my question, since the B-field is popping inwards for one of the wires and the other one is popping outwards in the middle between the two wires, wouldn't that mean the B-field is 0? If it is then how can the B-field come back outwards and inwards again?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
flyingpig said:
If it is then how can the B-field come back outwards and inwards again?

I can't understand what you are asking
 
Yes it is
 
Then how can the Field come back in and out on the far right and left?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
flyingpig said:
Then how can the Field come back in and out on the far right and left?

Why then can't? they are two independent fields ...

like for electric field ... if you place a conductor in its path ... it is zero inside it but again gains its strength outside it
 
cupid.callin said:
Why then can't? they are two independent fields ...

like for electric field ... if you place a conductor in its path ... it is zero inside it but again gains its strength outside it

But is the B-field only 0 at the mid point? Or is it everywhere between the two wires
 
Think about this in three dimensions.
The ONLY place the B field is zero is right along the line that's midway between the wires.
 
  • #10
only at the mid point because only at that point their strengths become equal and opposite

Edit:

Mag field due to long wire,
[tex]\vec{B}= \frac{\mu_{o}}{2\pi}\frac{i}{d}[/tex]
 
  • #11
Just one other question, I noticed the "finger" cross product rule is different from the wrap around right hand rule (not the curl one, like most calculus textbook teaches one) and this observation uses the wrap around the current rule
 
  • #12
Be more specific.

Are you referring to the rule which gives the direction of the B field around a current carrying wire, as "the wrap around right hand rule" ?
 
  • #13
Yes that one.

Another question

If I want to find the B-field created by the wire on the left, why would I use the distance between the wires? Let d be the distance between the wires, so shouldn't I use d + x where x is a positive quantity.
 
  • #14
flyingpig said:
Yes that one.
That's NOT a cross product at all. (Referring to the wrap around rule)

One question at a time, please! Your threads tend to get convoluted when you have multiple questions and/or topics in one post.

Another question

[STRIKE]If I want to find the B-field created by the wire on the left, why would I use the distance between the wires? Let d be the distance between the wires, so shouldn't I use d + x where x is a positive quantity.[/STRIKE]
 
  • #15
OKay I will make a new thread and ask it there
 
  • #16
No, it's OK now. Just didn't want to discuss two things in that one post -- plus it was a chance to give you a hard time. LOL
 
  • #17
flyingpig said:
If I want to find the B-field created by the wire on the left, why would I use the distance between the wires? Let d be the distance between the wires, so shouldn't I use d + x where x is a positive quantity.

Why would you want to use d+x?

You need the B field (produced by the left wire) at the location of the wire on the right. The distance from on to the other is d.

Let x = 0 if you like.
 
  • #18
SammyS said:
That's NOT a cross product at all. (Referring to the wrap around rule)

The thumb rule can be used to find the direction of cross product (if I'm getting correctly which rule is flyingpig talking about)
 
  • #19
cupid.callin said:
The thumb rule can be used to find the direction of cross product (if I'm getting correctly which rule is flyingpig talking about)
Cupid.C,
Look at posts 12, 13, and 14.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K