MHB Two dimensional rotational Matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Rotational
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everybody,

I am trying to learn about the electrodynamics. I am using the textbook, Introduction to Electrodynamics (2nd Ed) by D. J. Griffiths. I am working on the Problem 1.8. The question state:

Prove that the two-dimensional rotation matrix perverse the length of A. (That is, show that $(A_y')^2+(A_z')^2=(A_y)^2+(A_z)^2$)

$\left(\begin{array}{cc} A_y'\\ A_z'\end{array}\right)$=$\left(\begin{array}{cc} cos(\phi) & sin(\phi)\\ -sin(\phi) & cos(\phi) \end{array} \right)$ $\left(\begin{array}{cc} A_y\\A_z\end{array}\right)$

I am struck at the beginning.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
Dear Everybody,

I am trying to learn about the electrodynamics. I am using the textbook, Introduction to Electrodynamics (2nd Ed) by D. J. Griffiths. I am working on the Problem 1.8. The question state:

Prove that the two-dimensional rotation matrix perverse the length of A. (That is, show that $(A_y')^2+(A_z')^2=(A_y)^2+(A_z)^2$)

$\left(\begin{array}{cc} A_y'\\ A_z'\end{array}\right)$=$\left(\begin{array}{cc} cos(\phi) & sin(\phi)\\ -sin(\phi) & cos(\phi) \end{array} \right)$ $\left(\begin{array}{cc} A_y\\A_z\end{array}\right)$

I am struck at the beginning.
From the vector equation you have
[math]A_{y'} = cos( \theta ) A_y + sin( \theta ) A_z[/math]
[math]A_{z'} = -sin( \theta ) A_y + cos( \theta ) A_z[/math]

So
[math](A_{y'})^2 + (A_{z'})^2 = \left ( cos( \theta ) A_y + sin( \theta ) A_z \right ) ^2 + \left ( -sin( \theta ) A_y + cos( \theta ) A_z \right ) ^2[/math]

Expand it out (it's not quite as bad as it looks) and you will get
[math](A_{y'})^2 + (A_{z'})^2 = \left ( sin^2 ( \theta ) + cos^2( \theta ) \right ) (A_{y})^2 + \left ( sin^2( \theta ) + cos^2 ( \theta ) \right ) (A_z)^2[/math]

(Hint: The terms in [math]A_y ~ A_z[/math] cancel out.)

Can you finish out the details?

-Dan
 
I hope you mean "preserve", not "perverse"!
 
Country Boy said:
I hope you mean "preserve", not "perverse"!
I meant to preserve.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top