Two event horizons in close proximity

  • Thread starter Thread starter kurious
  • Start date Start date
kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
Two black holes of equal mass move together so their event horizons meet.
How would a photon initially going around one horizon in a circle,know which horizon to go around when it comes to the place where the horizons meet?
And if there were thousands of small black holes filling a large area of space, all with touching event horizons, how would the photon behave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kurious said:
Two black holes of equal mass move together so their event horizons meet.
How would a photon initially going around one horizon in a circle,know which horizon to go around when it comes to the place where the horizons meet?
And if there were thousands of small black holes filling a large area of space, all with touching event horizons, how would the photon behave?

Photons don't orbit at the event horizon. They unstably orbit at the Photon sphere.
 
When two black holes meet, they would most likely collapse into one. Similarly with lots of black holes touching.
 
DW said:
Photons don't orbit at the event horizon. They unstably orbit at the Photon sphere.

Can the orbit be stable in an idealized Schwarzschild black hole?
 
jcsd said:
Can the orbit be stable in an idealized Schwarzschild black hole?

No, that's actually the kind of hole I was referring to. For the ideal Schwarzschild hole the photon sphere is at
r_{ps} = \frac{3GM}{c^2}.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top