Two objects colliding and dropping at different distances

  • Thread starter Thread starter thisischris
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of a ball bearing colliding with a marble after rolling down a ramp. The ball bearing initially travels 1.2m vertically and 0.95m horizontally, with a calculated speed of 2 m/s. When the marble is introduced, the ball bearing lands 0.64m from the ramp, while the marble lands an additional 0.93m away. The user attempts to calculate the mass ratio of the ball bearing to the marble using momentum conservation but finds discrepancies in their results. The advice given emphasizes the importance of maintaining significant figures in calculations and suggests that errors stem from the time calculation in part A.
thisischris
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
A ball bearing is rolled down a ramp clamped at the edge of a bench. The ball bearing makes a head-on collosion with a marble at the bottom of the ramp.

My problem lies with question B.

A: Initially the ball bearing rolls down without a marble in place. The ball bearing falls a vertical distance of 1.2m and lands a horizontal distance of 0.95m from the end of the ramp. Show speed is 2ms.

Used s = ut + (0.5)t2 to calculate the time in 'air' = 0.49s.
Used s = ut + 0.5at again:
(s - 0.5at2)/t = u
(0.95 - 0) / 0.49 = 1.94 ms-1

B: When the ball bearing is rolled down the ramp with a marble in place, it knocks the marble forwards. The ball bearing lands a horizontal distance of 0.64m from ramp. The marble lands a further 0.93m from ramp. Calculate the ratio of masses of the ball bearing and the marble.

Answer: Momentum conservation, correct substitutions, m1 : m2 = 5.3

My attempt:
m1u + m2u = m1v + m2v
m1u = m1v + m2v As marble has 0 momentum initally.
m1(u - v) =m2v
m1(1.94 - v) =m2v

I then calculated m1's final velocity by using speed = distance / time. Hence v = 0.64 / 0.49 = 1.31ms-1
m2's final velocity by using speed = distance / time. Hence v = 0.64 + 0.93 / 0.49 = 3.20ms-1

m1(1.94 - 1.31) =m2(3.2)
m1(0.63) =m2(3.20)
m1 = m2(5.08)


I can't seem to understand why I'm quite a bit out.

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 1.94 is off by a little. Carry more significant figures in intermediate calculations, then round off at end of computation. Problem is caused by your computation in part A for time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top