Two photons spontaneous emission (2s->1s)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the spontaneous emission process of hydrogen transitioning from the 2s to the 1s state, specifically focusing on the mechanism of two-photon emission. Participants explore theoretical aspects, mathematical derivations, and references to literature on the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Adam seeks a full derivation of the 2s to 1s decay process and expresses difficulty in finding resources.
  • Some participants question the mechanism behind the transition, noting the absence of a strong oscillating dipole moment for this decay.
  • One participant suggests that the transition must involve two-photon emission due to the impossibility of a single photon transition, referencing the A-squared operator in the Hamiltonian.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the transition probability is zero for a single photon and describes the process as involving a decay to and from a virtual level.
  • References to literature, including a book by Alan Corney and specific papers on two-photon decay rates, are provided as potential resources for further understanding.
  • Participants discuss the nature of the virtual level involved in the decay process and whether the emission of photons occurs simultaneously or sequentially.
  • One participant compares the virtual level to those in Raman scattering, prompting further inquiry into their physical representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement on the mechanisms of the transition, with some proposing that two-photon emission is necessary while others seek clarification on the details. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of the virtual level and the nature of the photon emissions.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the virtual level and the specifics of the decay process, which are not fully elaborated upon. The mathematical steps involved in the derivation are also not resolved.

leviadam
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm doing a project that includes an hydrogen 2s->1s decay and I need the full derivation of this process, so if anyone can recommend about a book it would be great.
I first thought it should be easy to find but to tell you the truth I have looked and found scratch.

10x a lot,
Adam :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd also like to know how this works. There ought to be a mechanism that describes it. Some transitions have a strong oscillating dipole moment, but this one doesn't. Not even a quadrupole or higher moment. So what explains the transition process?
 
It comes from the A2 operator in the Hamiltonian, all the dipole and quadrupole etc comes from A*P, when A*p is possible A2 is neglected.
In 2s->1s A*p is impossible so there has to be a two photons emission.

Adam.
 
You say "it" comes from the A-sqaured operator, but what is "it"?

You say "the dipole moment" comes from A*P.

I know what "the dipole moment" is but I don't know what your "it" is. It is not helpful to say "it" comes from A-squared because I don't know what "it" is.
 
This is a quantum field of course, and is represented with ladder operators , so when you have A2 you get a product of two ladder operators that creates two photons.

Adam.
 
Last edited:
In the words of Marvin Gaye: "It takes two, baby."
You get a zero transition probability with a single photon, no matter what order you expand A.p to (dipole, quadrupole, etc). 2s->1s is completely forbidden. So if there's a transition (which there is), it's from taking into account a two-photon (A.A) term, that is, two photons are emitted.

What this corresponds to 'physically', if you like, is a decay to and then from a virtual level. 2s->virtual->1s.

And it's not terribly spontaneous.. IIRC, the lifetime of 2s is on the order of seconds.
 
alxm, you seem to know the phenomena, can you think of a book that has the full derivation?
 
leviadam said:
alxm, you seem to know the phenomena, can you think of a book that has the full derivation?

I can't seem to find one, but "Atomic and laser spectroscopy" by Alan Corney has some of it in section 7.4, but it's mostly geared towards experiment.
Poking around with Google turned up http://calima.univalle.edu.co/revista/vol38_1/articulos/pdf/3801365.pdf" which does a pretty good job.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have recently been to a conference, where some guy talked about two photon emission in semiconductors. In his papers he also refers to two photon emission in atomic optics and hydrogen and usually refers to the following papers:

Goldman, S. P. & Drake, G. W. F. "Relativistic two-photon decay rates of 2s1/2 hydrogenic ions", Phys. Rev. A 24, 183–191 (1981).

and

Shapiro, J. & Breit, G. "Metastability of 2s states of hydrogenic atoms", Phys. Rev. 113, 179–181 (1959).

I am no expert on that field, but maybe these papers contain what you are looking for.
 
  • #10
alxm said:
What this corresponds to 'physically', if you like, is a decay to and then from a virtual level. 2s->virtual->1s.

And it's not terribly spontaneous.. IIRC, the lifetime of 2s is on the order of seconds.

Any idea what the virtual level looks like? And is the decay process sequential (first one photon, then another photon a second later) or simultaneous?
 
  • #11
conway said:
Any idea what the virtual level looks like? And is the decay process sequential (first one photon, then another photon a second later) or simultaneous?

Well, it looks like an energy level in your calculations. In reality it looks like nothing since it doesn't actually exist outside of that - both photons are emitted simultaneously.

You could compare to virtual energy levels in Raman scattering.
 
  • #12
alxm said:
You could compare to virtual energy levels in Raman scattering.

OK. What do they look like physically?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K