Two thirds of cancers are based on luck

  • Thread starter Matt G
  • Start date
In summary, two thirds of cancers are based on random mutations in DNA, rather than lifestyle choices or environmental factors. However, lifestyle choices can still increase the risk of cancer. This statistic comes from a study by scientists at Johns Hopkins University. Having a family history of cancer does not guarantee cancer development. This finding underscores the importance of early detection, regular screenings, and personalized treatment approaches. Continued research is also necessary to better understand the role of random mutations in cancer development.
  • #1
Matt G
8
0
I am just curious what people here think of this claim from the new medical study? My impression is that the effects of quantum uncertainty are rarely if ever seen in the non quantum realm. Or to put it another way, wouldn't it be more likely that the cause of these cancers is indeed from genetic and environmental causes that are not yet understood rather than a fundamental effect of the random nature of existence?
 
Biology news on Phys.org

1. What does it mean when it is said that two thirds of cancers are based on luck?

When it is stated that two thirds of cancers are based on luck, it means that the development of cancer is primarily due to random mutations in the DNA of cells, rather than being caused by external factors such as lifestyle choices or environmental exposures.

2. Does this mean that lifestyle choices do not play a role in cancer development?

No, lifestyle choices such as smoking, poor diet, and lack of physical activity can still increase the risk of developing cancer. However, these factors are estimated to contribute to only about one third of all cancer cases.

3. How was this statistic determined?

The statistic that two thirds of cancers are based on luck comes from a study conducted by scientists at Johns Hopkins University. They analyzed data from previous studies on cancer mutations and determined that about 66% of cancer cases are due to random mutations.

4. Can individuals with a family history of cancer still be considered "lucky" in terms of cancer development?

Yes, having a family history of cancer does not necessarily mean that an individual will develop cancer. While genetics can play a role in cancer risk, it is estimated that only about 5-10% of cancers are inherited.

5. What implications does this statistic have for cancer prevention and treatment?

The finding that two thirds of cancers are based on luck highlights the importance of early detection and regular screenings, as well as the need for continued research in understanding the role of random mutations in cancer development. It also emphasizes the need for personalized treatment approaches, as the underlying causes of cancer may differ between individuals.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
25
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
846
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
69
Views
4K
Back
Top