What Are Type I, Type II, and Type III Regions in Calculus 3?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Medtner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Type
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the distinctions between Type I and Type II regions in the context of double integrals in calculus, specifically for functions of two variables z = ƒ(x,y) and three variables B = ƒ(x,y,z). Participants seek clarification on how these types of regions are defined and how they affect integration methods.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the differences between Type I and Type II regions and their representation in the textbook, noting that the integration methods seem similar to standard double and triple integrals.
  • Another participant suggests that the textbook in question might be by Stewart, who is noted for making these distinctions.
  • A detailed explanation is provided regarding Type I regions, defined as D = {(x, y) | a ≤ x ≤ b, g1(x) ≤ y ≤ g2(x)}, and Type II regions, defined as D = {(x, y) | c ≤ y ≤ d, h1(y) ≤ x ≤ h2(y)}. Examples of each type are given to illustrate the definitions.
  • It is mentioned that some regions can be described as both Type I and Type II, and that changing the order of integration can simplify the process for certain integrals.
  • A later reply acknowledges that the explanation provided helped clarify a point that the textbook had glossed over.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of Type I and Type II regions as presented, but there is no consensus on the overall clarity of the textbook's explanations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the potential limitations of the textbook's explanations, particularly regarding the clarity of the distinctions between the types of regions and their implications for integration.

Medtner
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
It's calculus 3 question
My textbook does a horrible job at explaining the differences between Type I and Type II regions for z =ƒ(x,y) functions, and Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3 for B=ƒ(x,y, z). And when integrating over these "D" regions, the method of integration doesn't really seem to be really different at all from normal ∫∫ and ∫∫∫ integrations. The only difference I see is that we're integrating with respect to functions g(x) and h(x) instead of variables. I just need someone to clarify wth my book is trying to show me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with that terminology. What textbook is it? If you tell us, I can see if there's a copy in the library I can look at to figure this out.
 
Medtner said:
It's calculus 3 question
My textbook does a horrible job at explaining the differences between Type I and Type II regions for z =ƒ(x,y) functions, and Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3 for B=ƒ(x,y, z). And when integrating over these "D" regions, the method of integration doesn't really seem to be really different at all from normal ∫∫ and ∫∫∫ integrations. The only difference I see is that we're integrating with respect to functions g(x) and h(x) instead of variables. I just need someone to clarify wth my book is trying to show me.
I'm going to guess that your textbook is one by Stewart, who I believe is the only person making these distinctions (Type I, Type II, etc.).
I'll focus on double integrals ##\int \int_D f(x, y) dA##. The Type I and Type II business has to do with how the region over which integration is being performed is defined. In a Type I region, ##D = \{(x, y) | a \le x \le b, g_1(x) \le y \le g_2(x) \}##. In other words, the inner integral runs from a lowest value of ##g_1(x)## up to ##g_2(x)##, and the outer integral runs from x = a to x = b. An example of such a Type I region would be the region bounded by the parobolas ##y = x^2 + 1## and ##y = x^2##.

A Type II region is one described by ##D = \{(x, y) | c \le y \le d, h_1(y) \le x \le h_2(y) \}##. The region bounded the graphs of ##x = y^2##, ##x = \frac 1 2 y^2 + 1##, the line y = 1, and the x-axis is a type II region. When you're integrating over this type of region, the inner integral involves a horizontal line running from ##h_1(y)## to ##h_2(y)##. The outer integral runs from y = c to y = d.

Some regions can be both types, which means that they can be described in either of the ways I showed above. In questions that ask you to change the order of integration, you are essentially changing from one description to the other. Some integrals can be very difficult or even impossible with one order of integration, but very easy if the order of integration is switched.

Hope that helps...
 
Although your explanation is similar to the textbook's, you managed to clarify one thing that they pretty much glossed over which helped a lot. Thanks so much, and yes it's Stewart.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K