Typo in elliptical orbit energy derivation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a potential typo in the derivation of energy for a satellite in an elliptical orbit, specifically questioning whether EO-2 is correctly represented. Participants highlight the importance of the polar angle in the derivation, indicating that the accuracy of the formula depends on its correct interpretation. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in mathematical representations to avoid confusion in orbital mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orbital mechanics
  • Familiarity with elliptical orbits
  • Knowledge of energy derivation in physics
  • Basic grasp of polar coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of energy in elliptical orbits
  • Study the role of polar angles in orbital mechanics
  • Examine common typographical errors in physics equations
  • Learn about satellite dynamics and energy conservation
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, aerospace engineers, and anyone involved in satellite dynamics or orbital mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

Taulant Sholla
Messages
96
Reaction score
5
I'm reading through a derivation for the energy of a satellite in an elliptical orbit. Shouldn't EO-2 read as:
c2.PNG

... and not as shown in the following?

c1.PNG
 

Attachments

  • c1.PNG
    c1.PNG
    52.3 KB · Views: 668
  • c2.PNG
    c2.PNG
    2.3 KB · Views: 600
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like a typo to me.
 
PeroK said:
Looks like a typo to me.
It would depend on what is the angle. Or where. It says it is the polar angle, right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K