News U.S.A. must sell Alaska to Korea and Japan

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jang Jin Hong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Japan
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the international financial crisis stemming from the inability of debtors to repay their debts, leading to significant financial losses for major money holders, particularly Asian central banks. The argument suggests that the U.S. could alleviate its national deficit by selling parts of Alaska to countries like Korea and Japan, as a means of compensating these banks. The conversation touches on the historical context of the U.S. dollar, noting its lack of gold backing and drawing parallels to the Mongol Empire's monetary practices, which led to civil unrest. Participants express concerns about the potential consequences of U.S. economic failure on the global economy, emphasizing the interconnectedness of nations in a globalized world. There are also speculations about future economic insulation by countries and the need for international cooperation to address financial crises. Overall, the dialogue reflects a complex interplay of debt, globalization, and the necessity for collaborative solutions among nations.
Jang Jin Hong
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
International financial crisis due to a simple fact
the debtor can not pay their debt.
so someone must lose money.
only big money holder can lose such a big money.
who is a bing money holder?
Asian central bank.
but Asian centural bank has no reason to lose their money.
the Debtor must give something to money holder.
U.S.A. must sell some part of Alaska to Korea and Japan.
Alaska was not originaly land of U.S.A.
by that money, U.S.A. must cancel their national deficit.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jang Jin Hong said:
International financial crisis due to a simple fact
the debtor can not pay their debt.
so someone must lose money.
only big money holder can lose such a big money.
who is a bing money holder?
Asian central bank.
but Asian centural bank has no reason to lose their money.
the Debtor must give something to money holder.
U.S.A. must sell some part of Alaska to Korea and Japan.
Alaska was not originaly land of U.S.A.
by that money, U.S.A. must cancel their national deficit.

Ok. It's a trillion dollars an acre.
They can have that little island next to Russia, just down the street from Sarah Palin's house.
 
OmCheeto said:
Ok. It's a trillion dollars an acre.
They can have that little island next to Russia, just down the street from Sarah Palin's house.

If central bank of U.S.A. go to bank run.
result will not be that of zimbabwe.

Money of U.S.A. do not exchangable with gold or other thing, and used as international exchange.for a long history. there is only one nation which is similar with U.S.A.
That is Mongol empire. Money of Mongol empire did not exchangabe with gold or silver, Mongol empire abuse money making ability and that introduce civil war.

If U.S.A. challenge to cancel their debt by inflation.
The result will be similar with collapse of Mongol empire.
 
Last edited:
The world economy cannot survive if the US economy fails. In fact what we have seen is that foreign investors have moved towards US dollars as a safe haven - the strength of the US dollar has been improving in recent weeks.

Like it or not, we are all in this together. Welcome to globalization.

However, I can't help but suspect that soon we will see countries moving to insulate their economies from the global economy, which could have serious implications for globalization.
 
Jang Jin Hong said:
If central bank of U.S.A. go to bank run.
result will not be that of zimbabwe.

Money of U.S.A. do not exchangable with gold or other thing, and used as international exchange.for a long history. there is only one nation which is similar with U.S.A.
That is Mongol empire. Money of Mongol empire did not exchangabe with gold or silver, Mongol empire abuse money making ability and that introduce civil war.

If U.S.A. challenge to cancel their debt by inflation.
The result will be similar with collapse of Mongol empire.

FYI. Try googling "gold standard". I've just learned in the last 60 seconds that:

http://economics.about.com/cs/money/a/gold_standard.htm
The gold standard has not been used in any major economy since August 15, 1971.

And like Ivan said, we are now a global economy.

I think we should solve this problem together, peaceably.

That brings up an interesting question though, have any countries gone to war over a bad debt? I know that countries have waged war because they were impoverished and wanted someone elses "stuff", but bad debt?
 
I have to agree with Ivan Seeking and OmCheeto. There's no more "you" or "us" when it comes to the economies of the world. We're all dependent on each other in a very vast and complex system of trading.
 
phyzmatix said:
I have to agree with Ivan Seeking and OmCheeto. There's no more "you" or "us" when it comes to the economies of the world. We're all dependent on each other in a very vast and complex system of trading.

Yes, and when brokers start heading offshore with hoards of cash because they are under investigation for fraud, we'll need the help of all the nations to track them down.

There's another question, what are the big secret money banking countries nowadays?
I know the old "Swiss bank account" cliche'.
Are there more now?
I'm dreadfully behind on my financial conspiracy reading. :rolleyes:
 
Jang Jin Hong said:
International financial crisis due to a simple fact
the debtor can not pay their debt.
so someone must lose money.
only big money holder can lose such a big money.
who is a bing money holder?
Asian central bank.
but Asian centural bank has no reason to lose their money.
the Debtor must give something to money holder.
U.S.A. must sell some part of Alaska to Korea and Japan.
Alaska was not originaly land of U.S.A.
by that money, U.S.A. must cancel their national deficit.

Make certain that Palin does not find about this post ... she is going to excommunicate you.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
Like it or not, we are all in this together. Welcome to globalization.

:smile:

However, I can't help but suspect that soon we will see countries moving to insulate their economies from the global economy, which could have serious implications for globalization.

I think this is just distributing the power among more nations - all the power/economy strength wouldn't be concentrated in US which is good. Secondly, there is no solution without collaborations .. so I see this much more like brining different nations together to solve the crisis and hence promoting further co-operation among them.
 

Similar threads

Replies
73
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
10K
Back
Top