UFOs Tracked on Military Radar by Wing Commander Alan Turner

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An RAF expert, Wing Commander Alan Turner, disclosed that he tracked a fleet of 35 unidentified flying objects on military radar, but was instructed by the Ministry of Defence to remain silent about it. This incident, which occurred 37 years ago, has sparked debate about the reliability of radar evidence in UFO sightings. Critics argue that older radar technology often produces clutter, leading to misidentifications of anomalous objects. As radar technology has advanced, the frequency of such sightings has decreased due to improved resolution and the ability to filter out false returns. The discussion highlights the importance of hard evidence in validating claims about UFOs and references historical military cases with documented radar contacts. Participants emphasize the need for credible sources and data to support claims regarding UFO sightings and the evolution of radar technology.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/ufos/article1682846.ece

AN RAF expert yesterday revealed how he tracked a whole fleet of “spaceships” on military radar — but the Ministry of Defence told him to keep quiet.

Wing Commander Alan Turner, 64, said colleagues sat stunned when 35 super-fast vessels appeared on their screens.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Come on.. that's an article in The Sun!
 


One thing about radar - and the older it gets the more often this is the case - is that it produces a lot of clutter. Again, as with photographic evidence not improving with improving camera technology, these types of sighting used to be very common, but are getting more rare as radar technology improves, with higher resolution and better ability to distinguish real from anomalous returns.

This "revalation" is 37 years old.
 


The Sun is not an acceptable source. Note also that RADAR evidence is only interesting if we actually have the evidence. Without any hard data, it is still just an unsupported claim. Note also that in the Napster, we have documented military cases directly from government files that often involve RADAR contacts, sometimes by multiple stations, and sometimes in conjuction with multiple credible witnesses.

Russ, perhaps you can present evidence supporting your claim? What are the historic and current rates of anamalous detections misidentified as UFOs?
 
Last edited:


Btw Wolram, stories from major news sources like the BBC, London Times, Washington Post, LA Times, NPR, PBS, etc., in addition to stories in local newspapers, are appropriate for the UFO News thread.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8406
 


Ivan Seeking said:
Russ, perhaps you can present evidence supporting your claim? What are the historic and current rates of anamalous detections misidentified as UFOs?
Cute, but a misdirection, Ivan.

In any case, the problem of clutter in radar returns is a well-publicized, common-knowledge part of history. Any good high school history teacher touches on it when discussing Pearl Harbor.

The advances in radar technology are pretty complicated, but if you wish to learn more, please feel free to start a discussion about it in the engineering forum or just google it. Here are a few good nuggets to get you started, though:

Many UFOs have been tracked on RADAR, especially in the earlier years of the technology.
http://www.ufology.ca/Content/R-01.htm

During the 1960s radar technology progressed in leaps and bounds as more powerful systems were invented to handle the steady increase in air traffic. Digital computers were then drafted into take over the complex task of simultaneously tracking dozens of aircraft of all shapes and sizes. In order to sort the wheat from the chaff which clutter air traffic control screens, today noise caused by weather systems, birds, insects and other “spurious echoes” such as might be generated by true UFOs (whatever they may be) are automatically removed by computers at source. This explains why the vast majority of reports of UFOs on radar were made during the 1940s and 1950s, before improved radar and computer technology eliminated them from modern equipment. [emphasis added]

http://www.uk-ufo.org/condign/secfilghosts1.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top