Ultra long range projectile problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter putongren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile Range
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the range of a projectile when considering the Earth's curvature and varying gravitational strength, as opposed to the simplified flat Earth model. Participants are exploring the implications of these factors on projectile motion, particularly for ultra long-range projectiles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using polar coordinates to model the projectile's trajectory and question the assumptions of constant gravitational strength. There are considerations about the effects of the Earth's rotation and how to represent the intersection of a circular path with parabolic trajectories.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with various approaches being suggested, including the use of polar coordinates and the need to clarify assumptions about gravitational strength. Some participants are seeking further clarification on the equations involved and the implications of their chosen methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of including initial velocity and projection angle in the equations, as well as the constraints of using a parabolic model to intersect with a circular path. There is also mention of neglecting air resistance and the Earth's rotation in the problem setup.

putongren
Messages
124
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Physics students know that if one fires a cannon ball and one assume that the Earth is flat and the gravitational strength is constant for all height, we use the equation Range = (Vo2/g)* sin 2 θ, Vo = initial velocity, g = 9.8 m/s2 , θ = projection angle. How do we find the equation for range if we do not assume the Earth is flat and gravitational strength is constant for all height, neglecting air resistance? Like for ultra long range projectiles.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt to solve the problem is to use polar coordinates instead of Cartesian coordinates. The origin is centered on the center of the Earth and the y coordinate axis intersects the zenith of the projectile motion. I do not know if this is correct, but I assumed that the motion of the projectile follows a parabolic flight path. So the equation for parabolas in polar coordinates is r = { l \ {1 + e *cosθ} }, l = semi-latus, e = eccentricity. But after that, I have no idea how to do the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a great idea! I wouldn't have thought of that right away, but what a natural approach.

Just solve for the landing point when the distance to the origin is the same R as the firing point.
 
While g is constant, what is the effect of the projectile's tangential velocity?

What happens if the projectile is fired in the direction of rotation of the earth? How about in the direction opposite the rotation of the earth?
 
wait, my math sux, I dun know how to do that.
 
I forgot to mention to neglect rotation of the earth.
 
Ah - so then one only needs to consider the intersection of a circle with a family of parabolas, which have the axis parallel to the diameter of the circle.
 
Astronuc said:
Ah - so then one only needs to consider the intersection of a circle with a family of parabolas, which have the axis parallel to the diameter of the circle.

Correct, to clarify it further consider only 2 dimensions (the Earth is a circle not a sphere).
 
putongren said:
Correct, to clarify it further consider only 2 dimensions (the Earth is a circle not a sphere).

Cool. Show us your work and the solution!
 
I think there's some confusion. Do NOT assume that gravitational strength is constant for all height. That should make the problem a little harder.
 
  • #10
putongren said:
I think there's some confusion. Do NOT assume that gravitational strength is constant for all height. That should make the problem a little harder.

A little, but not much. Show us the relevant equations, and your attempt at a solution. This is homework/coursework, so per the PF "Rules" link at the top of the page, we are not going to do your work for you.

Show us your work.
 
  • #11
berkeman said:
A little, but not much. Show us the relevant equations, and your attempt at a solution. This is homework/coursework, so per the PF "Rules" link at the top of the page, we are not going to do your work for you.

Show us your work.

Ok here's my try.

Use polar coordinates. Superimpose r = radius of Earth and r = { l \ {1 + e *cosθ} } (if you plot the graph of both equations together, you will see an ellipse on top of a circle with them centered on the same point). Then you can solve for θ (There are two answers, θ1 and θ2 ). Once you know θ1 and θ2, you know the intersection of the flight path of the cannon ball with the surface of the planet. The arc of the circle that connects the points where the circle and ellipse meet is the range. Range = 2*diameter*π2/(θ12).

The question remains is how to determine l = semilatus rectum and e = eccentricity. These two values determine the shape of the parabola, and hence the flight path of the cannon ball. I know that these two values is somehow connected with the equation of gravity, which is F = GMm/r2. That's all I know how to do.
 
  • #12
I forgot to mention something. Make sure initial velocity of the cannon ball and angle at which the cannon ball is shot at is in the equation to determine the range.
 
  • #13
putongren said:
I forgot to mention something. Make sure initial velocity of the cannon ball and angle at which the cannon ball is shot at is in the equation to determine the range.
There are two angles to consider. One is the angle swept by the arc of the range. Instead of being a flat surface, the range is a circular arc, and the length is Rθ, where R is the radius of the Earth's surface, and θ is the angle subtended by the arc.

Then there is the angle φ of initial projectile velocity with respect to the Earth's radius or the tangent to the surface.

There is also a constraint imposed by selecting a parabola (as opposed to some other form) to intersect with a circle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
27K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K