Ultrasound Attenuation: Why Power Ratio?

AI Thread Summary
Ultrasound attenuation is fundamentally related to the power ratio rather than field quantities due to its dependence on wave intensity, which is power per unit area. The relationship is expressed logarithmically, allowing for the calculation of attenuation using the ratio of powers, typically converted to decibels for practical applications. While voltage can be used in calculations, it must be squared to relate to power, hence the preference for power ratios. This logarithmic approach aligns with the logarithmic nature of human perception, particularly in hearing. Ultimately, the use of power ratios provides a more meaningful representation of attenuation effects in various media.
Karlos
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a simple physics question.

It is about ultrasound attenuation.

Why is the attenuation a function of the log of the POWER ratio? i.e. why must it be the ratio of power quantities rather than field quantities? what is the physical basis of this relationship?

thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Attenuation is not a function of the power ratio but can be measured by this ratio. Attenuation is a function of the frequency and properties of the medium.

I am not sure if you are taking about decibel scale or the coefficient of attenuation. They both may involve logarithms.
The effect of attenuation on amplitude (or power) of the wave can be usually described by an exponential decay as a function of distance.
P=P_o e^{- \alpha x}
where α is the coefficient of attenuation. If you want to express α as a function of the power, you will need to use a logarithm.
But α is a parameter describing the medium rather than the attenuation of a given beam of ultrasound.

To describe how much a given beam was attenuated in a given experiment you can use the ratio of the powers. Like .1 or 10%.
But more often people prefer to take the logarithm of the ratio and multiply it by 10 and give the answer in decibels. One reason is that the ear is a logarithmic detector rather a linear one.
 
Thank you for your reply nasu.

My question was more about the quantities used to compute the ratio itself.

If you are comparing an output voltage to an input voltage for a give value of x (distance) and a given medium you could write:

##10log\frac{P}{P_0} = 10log\frac{V^2}{V^2_0}=20log\frac{V}{V_0}##

Where P is the power and V is the voltage.

I want to understand why it is the POWER and not the voltage directly that you must input. If using the voltage directly you must either square it, or multiply the logarithm by 2.
 
OK, then you are asking why something is defined the way is defined.
And the answer can be only that it is useful or meaningful. It's not that it has to be this way.
You can think that the effects of the wave (sound or EM) depend on the wave's intensity, which is power per unit area.
Sounds with the same intensity may have different field quantities (pressure, displacement, etc).
 
  • Like
Likes Karlos
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top