Ultrasound Attenuation: Why Power Ratio?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Karlos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Attenuation Ultrasound
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Ultrasound attenuation is fundamentally related to the logarithmic ratio of power quantities rather than field quantities. The coefficient of attenuation (α) describes the medium's properties and is expressed through an exponential decay function, P = P₀ e^{-αx}. To quantify attenuation in practical terms, the logarithm of the power ratio is often converted into decibels (dB), as human perception of sound is logarithmic. This approach emphasizes the significance of intensity, which is power per unit area, over direct voltage measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ultrasound physics and wave propagation
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions and their applications in acoustics
  • Knowledge of the decibel scale and its relevance to sound intensity
  • Basic principles of exponential decay in physical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between power and intensity in wave mechanics
  • Study the derivation and application of the decibel scale in acoustics
  • Explore the properties of different media affecting ultrasound attenuation
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of wave attenuation using exponential functions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, acoustics engineers, and students studying wave phenomena, particularly those focused on ultrasound technology and its applications in various fields.

Karlos
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a simple physics question.

It is about ultrasound attenuation.

Why is the attenuation a function of the log of the POWER ratio? i.e. why must it be the ratio of power quantities rather than field quantities? what is the physical basis of this relationship?

thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Attenuation is not a function of the power ratio but can be measured by this ratio. Attenuation is a function of the frequency and properties of the medium.

I am not sure if you are taking about decibel scale or the coefficient of attenuation. They both may involve logarithms.
The effect of attenuation on amplitude (or power) of the wave can be usually described by an exponential decay as a function of distance.
P=P_o e^{- \alpha x}
where α is the coefficient of attenuation. If you want to express α as a function of the power, you will need to use a logarithm.
But α is a parameter describing the medium rather than the attenuation of a given beam of ultrasound.

To describe how much a given beam was attenuated in a given experiment you can use the ratio of the powers. Like .1 or 10%.
But more often people prefer to take the logarithm of the ratio and multiply it by 10 and give the answer in decibels. One reason is that the ear is a logarithmic detector rather a linear one.
 
Thank you for your reply nasu.

My question was more about the quantities used to compute the ratio itself.

If you are comparing an output voltage to an input voltage for a give value of x (distance) and a given medium you could write:

##10log\frac{P}{P_0} = 10log\frac{V^2}{V^2_0}=20log\frac{V}{V_0}##

Where P is the power and V is the voltage.

I want to understand why it is the POWER and not the voltage directly that you must input. If using the voltage directly you must either square it, or multiply the logarithm by 2.
 
OK, then you are asking why something is defined the way is defined.
And the answer can be only that it is useful or meaningful. It's not that it has to be this way.
You can think that the effects of the wave (sound or EM) depend on the wave's intensity, which is power per unit area.
Sounds with the same intensity may have different field quantities (pressure, displacement, etc).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Karlos

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K