Unable to model Transresistance amplifier with feedback correctly

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the challenges faced while modeling a transresistance amplifier using z-parameters and comparing it with nodal analysis results. The user detailed their approach, including the z-parameter values derived from the circuit and the nodal analysis equations for both the π model and the z-parameters model. The discrepancy in results led to confusion, which the user attributed to a potential mix-up between the input current i1 and the current source i. This highlights the importance of accurately defining current directions in circuit analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transresistance amplifiers and their operation
  • Familiarity with z-parameters and their application in circuit modeling
  • Knowledge of nodal analysis techniques in electrical engineering
  • Proficiency in using π models for transistor circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of z-parameters in amplifier circuits
  • Learn advanced nodal analysis techniques for complex circuits
  • Explore common pitfalls in feedback analysis for transresistance amplifiers
  • Review the impact of current direction conventions in circuit analysis
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, circuit designers, and students studying amplifier design and feedback systems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those working with transresistance amplifiers and z-parameter modeling.

eyeweyew
Messages
35
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Transresistance amplifier modelled with z-parameters with feedback does not match with nodal analysis results
Relevant Equations
z-parameters model two-port network model and nodal analysis
I spent the whole day trying to figure why transresistance amplifier modelled with z-parameters does not match with nodal analysis results but I sill can't figure out. I desperate need help on this...

I write down step by step what I did for a very simple transresistance amplifier here and hope someone can point out what I did wrong:

The following is a very simple transistor I use as a transresistance amplifier example here:

Untitled3.jpg

and the following is the corresponding π model assume output resistance r o = ∞ just to make it simple:

Untitled10.jpg


I converted the circuit to a z-parameters model as follows:

Untitled5.jpg

with the following z-parameters value from the circuit:
$$Z_{11} = \frac {v_1} {i_1}\Bigm|_{i_2=0}=r_π$$
$$Z_{21} = \frac {v_2} {i_1}\Bigm|_{i_2=0}=-g_mr_πR_C$$
$$Z_{12} = \frac {v_1} {i_2}\Bigm|_{i_1=0}=0$$
$$Z_{22} = \frac {v_2} {i_2}\Bigm|_{i_1=0}=R_C$$

so my z-parameters model ends up like this:
Untitled6.jpg


When I added feedback to the π model as follows:

Untitled1.jpg

and did nodal analysis, I got:

$$Nodal\ analysis:$$
$$1)\ i=\frac {v_i} {r_π}+\frac {v_i-v_o} {R_f}$$
$$2)\ g_mv_i\ +\frac {v_o-v_i} {R_f}\ +\frac {v_o} {R_C}=0$$
$$\Rightarrow \frac {v_o} {i}=\frac {-R_Cr_π(g_mR_f-1)} {R_C+R_f+r_π+g_mr_πR_C}$$

However, when added the same feedback to the equivalent z-parameters model as follows:

1709965347193.png

and did nodal analysis:

$$Nodal\ analysis:$$
$$1)\ \frac {-g_mr_πR_Ci-v_o} {R_C}=\frac {v_o-v_i} {R_f}$$
$$2)\ i=\frac {v_i-v_o} {R_f}\ +\frac {v_i} {r_π}$$
$$\Rightarrow \frac {v_o} {i}=\frac {-R_Cr_π(R_fg_m + g_mr_π - 1)} {R_C+R_f+r_π}$$

The results do not match. I really have no idea what I have missed. Any helps or pointers will be greatly appreciated!!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    27.8 KB · Views: 83
  • Untitled1.jpg
    Untitled1.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 77
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I got it. I mixed up the current i1 going into the input port with the current source i
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K