Engineering Unable to model Transresistance amplifier with feedback correctly

AI Thread Summary
The user is struggling to reconcile the results of a transresistance amplifier modeled with z-parameters and nodal analysis, finding discrepancies in the outcomes. They provided detailed calculations for both the z-parameters and nodal analysis, indicating that the feedback implementation differs between the two methods. The z-parameters model yielded a different expression for output voltage compared to the nodal analysis results. The user suspects that the issue may stem from confusing the input currents in their calculations. They are seeking assistance to identify the error in their modeling approach.
eyeweyew
Messages
35
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Transresistance amplifier modelled with z-parameters with feedback does not match with nodal analysis results
Relevant Equations
z-parameters model two-port network model and nodal analysis
I spent the whole day trying to figure why transresistance amplifier modelled with z-parameters does not match with nodal analysis results but I sill can't figure out. I desperate need help on this...

I write down step by step what I did for a very simple transresistance amplifier here and hope someone can point out what I did wrong:

The following is a very simple transistor I use as a transresistance amplifier example here:

Untitled3.jpg

and the following is the corresponding π model assume output resistance r o = ∞ just to make it simple:

Untitled10.jpg


I converted the circuit to a z-parameters model as follows:

Untitled5.jpg

with the following z-parameters value from the circuit:
$$Z_{11} = \frac {v_1} {i_1}\Bigm|_{i_2=0}=r_π$$
$$Z_{21} = \frac {v_2} {i_1}\Bigm|_{i_2=0}=-g_mr_πR_C$$
$$Z_{12} = \frac {v_1} {i_2}\Bigm|_{i_1=0}=0$$
$$Z_{22} = \frac {v_2} {i_2}\Bigm|_{i_1=0}=R_C$$

so my z-parameters model ends up like this:
Untitled6.jpg


When I added feedback to the π model as follows:

Untitled1.jpg

and did nodal analysis, I got:

$$Nodal\ analysis:$$
$$1)\ i=\frac {v_i} {r_π}+\frac {v_i-v_o} {R_f}$$
$$2)\ g_mv_i\ +\frac {v_o-v_i} {R_f}\ +\frac {v_o} {R_C}=0$$
$$\Rightarrow \frac {v_o} {i}=\frac {-R_Cr_π(g_mR_f-1)} {R_C+R_f+r_π+g_mr_πR_C}$$

However, when added the same feedback to the equivalent z-parameters model as follows:

1709965347193.png

and did nodal analysis:

$$Nodal\ analysis:$$
$$1)\ \frac {-g_mr_πR_Ci-v_o} {R_C}=\frac {v_o-v_i} {R_f}$$
$$2)\ i=\frac {v_i-v_o} {R_f}\ +\frac {v_i} {r_π}$$
$$\Rightarrow \frac {v_o} {i}=\frac {-R_Cr_π(R_fg_m + g_mr_π - 1)} {R_C+R_f+r_π}$$

The results do not match. I really have no idea what I have missed. Any helps or pointers will be greatly appreciated!!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    27.8 KB · Views: 75
  • Untitled1.jpg
    Untitled1.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 66
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I got it. I mixed up the current i1 going into the input port with the current source i
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top