Unbiased estimator/MSE from a Gamma dist.

  • Thread starter Thread starter daoshay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gamma
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining whether the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) theta-hat = xbar/4 from the gamma distribution is unbiased and how to compute its mean squared error (MSE). Participants clarify that bias is calculated as E(theta-hat) - theta, and MSE is defined as E[(theta-hat - theta)^2]. There is a mention of the gamma distribution's mean being 4theta, leading to the relationship theta = mu/4. Additionally, it is noted that the MLE for theta is generally unbiased for large samples, although some numerical analyses suggest a slight positive bias. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these statistical properties for accurate estimation.
daoshay
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have given some serious effort to working out and understanding the MLE of a distribution. From the distribution f(x;\theta)= x^{3}e^{-x/\theta}/(6\theta^{4}), I have gotten the MLE theta-hat = xbar/4

I have a lot of difficulty figuring out if it is an unbiased estimator or not. How do I determine the expected value of theta-hat?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
daoshay said:
I have given some serious effort to working out and understanding the MLE of a distribution. From the distribution f(x;\theta)= x^{3}e^{-x/\theta}/(6\theta^{4}), I have gotten the MLE theta-hat = xbar/4

I have a lot of difficulty figuring out if it is an unbiased estimator or not. How do I determine the expected value of theta-hat?

You're saying MLE in the text and MSE in the title. For the Mean Squared Error, you can get a Bayesian minimum. (see Gamma Distribution in the Wiki). You make a Maximum Likelihood Estimate of a parameter, not a distribution. You can write a likelihood function for a distribution.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry, I was rushed while typing that up and I'm afraid I wasn't clear. I found the MLE for the parameter theta. I am supposed to test it for all theta for bias and then find the MSE of theta-hat.

Based on the gamma family, the mean of this distribution should be 4theta --> theta = mu/4
Bias is E(theta-hat)-theta, right?

Now, I'm supposed to find the MSE of theta-hat E[(theta-hat -theta)^2] right?
So, am I supposed to use the value of theta based on the distribution? I'll check my work on the expansion and check back later. Thanks for your patience. =)
 
daoshay said:
I'm sorry, I was rushed while typing that up and I'm afraid I wasn't clear. I found the MLE for the parameter theta. I am supposed to test it for all theta for bias and then find the MSE of theta-hat.

Based on the gamma family, the mean of this distribution should be 4theta --> theta = mu/4
Bias is E(theta-hat)-theta, right?

Now, I'm supposed to find the MSE of theta-hat E[(theta-hat -theta)^2] right?
So, am I supposed to use the value of theta based on the distribution? I'll check my work on the expansion and check back later. Thanks for your patience. =)

Your equation has only one parameter so it's a simple exponential distribution (or gamma with k=1). \theta is the reciprocal of the rate parameter which is often written as \lambda. So E|X|=\theta=\frac{1}{\lambda}. Var|X|=\frac{1}{\lambda^2}. For MSE use the Baysian minimum that I referred to earlier. Are you using any dummy (or real) data here?

EDIT: I'm using \theta above as the mean of the distribution F(x;\theta). Otherwise, this is not making any sense to me.
 
Last edited:
daoshay said:
I have given some serious effort to working out and understanding the MLE of a distribution. From the distribution f(x;\theta)= x^{3}e^{-x/\theta}/(6\theta^{4}),

Are you sure that shouldn't be f(x|\theta)? ie L(\theta|x)=f(x|\theta).

EDIT: OK. I see that k=4. Now for some N you can estimate \theta for the gamma distribution. As far as I know the ML estimate of \theta is unbiased, assuming an unbiased sample. \hat{\theta} =\frac{1}{kN}\sum_{i=1}^{N}x_{i}.
 
Last edited:
I looked further into the issue of estimator bias for the gamma distribution. Numerical analysis for moderate sized samples indicate a small "upward" or positive bias for ML estimates of the mean and variance.

http://web.uvic.ca/econ/research/papers/ewp0908.pdf

The bias of \hat{\theta} is shown on page 8, equation (14).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top