Unbounded perturbed geometry due to analyticity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CharlesJQuarra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limitations of a specific Ansatz for gravitational wave perturbations of the metric h_{\mu \nu} in flat Minkowski spacetime. The Ansatz is defined as g_{\mu \nu} = \eta_{\mu \nu} + h_{\mu \nu}, with h^{\mu}_{\mu}=0 and the requirement of being in the Transverse-Traceless gauge, leading to the Cauchy-Riemann equations. The analysis reveals that the Ansatz cannot asymptotically approach Minkowski spacetime due to the unbounded nature of the perturbations, which contradicts the linear regime necessary for gravitational waves. The discussion highlights the inconsistency of the Transverse-Traceless gauge with the proposed metric form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational wave theory and perturbation metrics
  • Familiarity with the Transverse-Traceless gauge conditions
  • Knowledge of Cauchy-Riemann equations in complex analysis
  • Basic principles of Minkowski spacetime and its properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Transverse-Traceless gauge on gravitational wave propagation
  • Investigate the relationship between complex functions and gravitational wave metrics
  • Explore alternative Ansätze that maintain asymptotic Minkowski conditions
  • Learn about the mathematical treatment of perturbations in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in gravitational wave physics, and students studying general relativity who seek to understand the complexities of metric perturbations and gauge conditions.

CharlesJQuarra
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have a certain Ansatz for a gravitational wave perturbation of the metric h_{\mu \nu} that is nonzero near an axis of background flat Minkowski spacetime

The Ansatz has the following form:

<br /> g_{\mu \nu} = \eta_{\mu \nu} + h_{\mu \nu} = \begin{bmatrix} -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 1 + V(x,y,t) &amp; U(x,y,t) &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; U(x,y,t) &amp; 1 -V(x,y,t) &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{bmatrix}<br />

The Ansatz has the following property:

h^{\mu}_{\mu}=0

I want the Ansatz to be also in the Transverse-Traceless gauge, which implies

\partial_{\mu} h^{\mu \nu} = 0

When I apply this condition on the Ansatz, I'm left with two nontrivial conditions:

\frac{\partial U}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial V}{\partial y}

\frac{\partial U}{\partial y}=- \frac{\partial V}{\partial x}

Oh by Thor Almighty! these are the Cauchy-Riemann equations!

Now, is well known that *analytic complex functions are either constant or unbounded*.I am trying to interpret this correctly:

The Ansatz geometry does not seem to be able to become asymptotically Minkowski, if one asks that the metric is in the Transverse-Traceless gauge. For any far away region from the x=0, y=0 axis, h_{\mu \nu} will become larger in magnitude than \eta_{\mu \nu}, which seems that is not our linear regime anymore, and would produce some large deformations
Is there an intuitive reason why the Transverse-Traceless gauge is not consistent with a perturbed metric that has this form? what if I would've tried a compact set, bounded on z as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't describe your ansatz as a gravitational wave. Gravitational waves are transverse, so if the perturbations to the metric are in the x and y elements, it needs to propagate in the z direction, and therefore U and V need to depend on z. In fact, they need to depend on the quantity z-t or z+t.
 
Hi Ben,

True, I've should've added it explicitly. In any case the fact that the only nontrivial perturbation components are on the xx, xy, yx and yy means that derivatives of t and z do not show up in the gauge conditions \partial_{\mu} h^{\mu \nu} = 0.

The issue is that, for example, I cannot have the h_{ij} fields orthogonal to z propagation to vanish after a maximum width (like it would be the case for example, with a Gaussian beam), because the holomorphic nature of the non-trivial gauge conditions, forces these components to either be constant or become too large far away from the origin, even while one would've expected the functions to taper and become zero as we move away from the region with nontrivial fields, as we should be approaching Minkowski spacetime.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
944
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K