Uncertainty In a Physics Experiment

In summary, the conversation discusses methods for calculating the uncertainty of human reaction time when using a stopwatch in an experiment to determine frictional force. The suggested method involves taking the smallest measurement of the stopwatch and dividing it by the smallest average time, but the speaker questions its validity. An alternative method is proposed, which involves using a sharp sound and analyzing its waveform to eliminate human reaction time from the experiment. This method may provide more accurate results.
  • #1
FrameOfMind
1
0
Hello,

I'm trying to figure out a way to calculate a suitable uncertainty value for the accuracy of a human measuring timing values during an experiment.

The experiment was designed to determine the frictional force acting on a trolley as it is pulled along by a string attached to a falling weight. We took three measurements of the time for the trolley to pass a set distance after dropping the weight for each mass value. The mass was increased by 0.5kg for each test. Afterwards, we took the mean of the three values for each mass and used that in our further calculations for Acceleration, Force, and Friction.

For the uncertainty of the stopwatch itself, we took the smallest measurement of the stop watch (0.01s) and divided it by the smallest average time (in this case, 1.24s), then multiplied it by 100 to get the error percentage. However, we weren't really given a suitable method to determine the uncertainty of the human reaction when starting and stopping the stopwatch at the right time (I believe the method we were given was unsuitable, since we were told to click start/stop on the stop watch as quickly as possible, which I think doesn't really measure "reaction time", rather "how quickly can your finger press a button twice in quick succession?").

I've tried the following method to determine the human uncertainty:

Calculate the standard deviation for each of the sets of timing values, eg:
mean time = (1.25 + 1.28 + 1.19)/3 = 1.24
standard deviation = sqrt(((1.25 - 1.24)^2 + (1.28 - 1.24)^2 + (1.19 - 1.24)^2)/3) = ~0.037

Then I take the mean of all the standard deviations, and I arrive at a value of 0.02s.

Then I once again divide the uncertainty by the smallest average time and multiply by 100 to get the error percentage, then I add it to the rest of the error values to obtain the total error percentage. The value I obtained seems to be quite small, which intuitively seems quite unrealistic since I've heard the average human reaction time is roughly 0.2-0.25s. The overall error percentage is also only 3.362%, which seems a little too good to be true using such rudimentary equipment.

My question: is this the right method to use, or have I done something wrong? If not, what would you suggest I do to get a suitable uncertainty for the reaction time?

(By the way, this may seem like homework and that it doesn't belong in this particular section, but it isn't really. I don't actually have to go into this much detail for my assignment, I'm just genuinely interested in how I might figure this out.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How about instead of hitting a stopwatch button directly you just record a sharp crisp sound perhaps using something metallic on glass. Then analyse the waveform in something like Audacity to determine the time. You are not really measuring reaction time because you can see the object you are timing, approaching the trigger point. Therefore over a few runs and swinging your arm down in an arc to make the sound at the predicted contact time you should be able to eliminate the human reaction time from your experiment.

hope that made sense.
 

1. What is uncertainty in a physics experiment?

Uncertainty in a physics experiment refers to the lack of perfect knowledge or precision in the measurement of a physical quantity. It is the degree of doubt or error associated with a measurement, and it is often expressed as a range of possible values.

2. Why is uncertainty important in a physics experiment?

Uncertainty is important in a physics experiment because it provides a measure of the reliability and accuracy of the results. It allows scientists to understand the limitations of their measurements and to make informed decisions about the validity of their findings.

3. How is uncertainty calculated in a physics experiment?

Uncertainty is calculated by considering the precision and accuracy of the measuring instrument and the limitations of the experimental procedure. It is typically expressed as a numerical value and unit, such as ±0.1 cm or ±2 seconds.

4. What factors can contribute to uncertainty in a physics experiment?

There are several factors that can contribute to uncertainty in a physics experiment, including limitations of the measuring instrument, human error, environmental conditions, and the inherent variability of the physical phenomenon being studied.

5. How can uncertainty be reduced in a physics experiment?

Uncertainty can be reduced in a physics experiment by using more precise measuring instruments, improving experimental techniques, and increasing the number of trials or measurements taken. It is also important to carefully consider and control for any factors that may introduce variability or error in the experiment.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
535
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
941
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top