What is the Uncertainty of Weight Flow Rate in a Discharging Water Experiment?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the experimental uncertainty of weight flow rate derived from a water discharge experiment using a Vernier Dual Range Force Sensor and LoggerPro software. The user, Jonathan, seeks to determine the uncertainty of the weight flow rate, given a constant absolute uncertainty of ±0.01 N for weight measurements. Buzz suggests using a quadratic fit to estimate the derivative at each data point and calculating the standard deviation of the differences between these values and the software's output to find the uncertainty in the weight flow rate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of numerical differentiation techniques
  • Familiarity with the Vernier Dual Range Force Sensor
  • Basic knowledge of quadratic fitting methods
  • Proficiency in using LoggerPro software for data analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to perform numerical differentiation using quadratic fits
  • Research the statistical methods for calculating standard deviation from experimental data
  • Explore the capabilities of Vernier LoggerPro software for derivative calculations
  • Study the principles of experimental uncertainty in physics measurements
USEFUL FOR

Students conducting physics experiments, particularly those focused on fluid dynamics, as well as educators and researchers interested in understanding experimental uncertainty in measurements.

Jonathan Densil
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I know this is more of a physics question, but I tried there and wasn't successful.
I have done a physics experiment measuring the weight as a function time of the discharge of water from a cylindrical bottle with a pinhole at the bottom. What I ultimately want to get at is the weight flow rate as a function of time. I already have the equation describing this scenario, but I don't want to get a theoretical uncertainty, I want an experimental uncertainty for weight flow rate. To get weight flow rate, I took the numerical derivation of the weight using Vernier's LoggerPro software. The constant absolute uncertainty of the weight is ##\pm 0.01## N for all data points. Since I am taking the derivative of the weight values to get weight flow rate, what would be the uncertainty of the weight flow rate. If you need any more data or information, feel free to ask. I have around 2000 data points for 5 trials :wink:

Homework Equations


If the uncertainty of the weight is ##\pm 0.01## N, what is the uncertainty of the weight flow rate (derivative of the weight as a function of time)?

The Attempt at a Solution


When I looked this up on the web, almost all of the solutions involved some next level math that I didn't understand. I have been teaching myself calculus (limits, derivatives, integrals) on my own time since I am in Grade 11 (I only take calculus next year) Soooo... I don't know where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jonathan:

I do not know enough to advise you how to complete the calculation, but here is where I would start.

Imagine calculating an estimate of the derivative at each data point. For each but the endpoints, find a quadratic that passes through the point and its neighbors. You can then have an expression for the value of the derivative for each quadratic. Do you know how to calculate the error range of the quadratic derivatives based on the error range of the data points?

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Buzz
 
I already have the derivatives at each point, I'm just not sure how to calculate the uncertainty for each derived point.
Thanks for your help though,

Kind regards,
Jonathan
 
Hi Jonathan:

I am not sure I understand the sequence of steps you used to get where you are. This is what I guess you did.

1. Collect measured data points givings pairs of values: weight and time.
2. Calculate a least mean squared (LMS) fit for some form of function w(t) with one or more coefficients to be determined by the LMS calculation. If this is correct, what is the form of the w(t) function?
3. You determined the error rate +/-0.01 N from the LMS fit.
4. You calculated the derivative w'(t) = d/dt w(t).

If this is correct, what you are missing is the equivalent of the raw measured values for w'(t). If you had those you could calculate the standard deviation of the differences between these raw measured values and w'(t). That would be the +/- error range of the derivative. One way to approximate equivalent measured values for the derivative data points is to use a quadratic fit as I described in post #3. There may be some better way if doing that than by using quadratics, but I think that the quadratics would give you a pretty good approximation.

Regards,
Buzz
 
The steps that I took:
  1. Using the Vernier Dual Range Force Sensor, I measured the weight of the bottle as the water was flowing out of the hole at the bottom
  2. I organized the data into a table of time on the left column and weight on the right column in Vernier LoggerPro software
  3. Using the software, took a numerical derivation (calculated using its own means) of the weight as a function of time to get weight flow rate.
  4. According to the Vernier Dual Range Force Sensor, the uncertainty given is 0.01 N.
I don't know what the uncertainty of the weight flow rate after LoggerPro took the derivation of the data points.
 
Jonathan Densil said:
According to the Vernier Dual Range Force Sensor, the uncertainty given is 0.01 N.
Hi Jonathan:

My guess is that the 0.01 N value is the standard deviation of an individual measurement using the DRFS device. Since I do not know the Vernier LoggerPro software, I am not sure what it is doing to calculate the derivatives. Is there a way for you to find out what the software does? If not, I suggest using a spreadsheet and the quadratic method to calculate the derivative at each time value and then the mean and standard deviation (SD) of the differences between those values and the software values. If the mean is very small compared with the SD, I would use +/- SD as an estimate for the error range.

BTW: If you average the weight measurements from the five trials, the resulting weight error range would be 0.01 divided by the square root of 5.

Good luck.

Regards,
Buzz
 
upload_2016-2-28_14-3-21.png

That is all of my trials data. I'm not aware of what the quadratic method is, sorry, can you please explain?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K