When do I use these equations for calculating linewidths?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gavroy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
hi

i am looking for the correct equation, that gives me the linewidth by knowing the time of the emission process.

so far, i found in the internet:

Δf=1/(Δt), Δf=1/(4πΔt) and Δf=1/(2Δt)

can you tell me, when i have to use which of these equations and maybe whether you think that these equations are correct?

sry for my english, still practising! ;-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gavroy, Getting the factor right requires saying precisely what you mean by the lifetime and the linewidth. A decaying state is described by a wavefunction |ψ|2 ~ exp(-Γt/ħ), so the lifetime of the state may be defined as Δτ = ħ/Γ.

The shape of the line is a Lorentzian, 1/((E-E0)2 + (Γ/2)2) which reaches its half-height at E = E0 ± Γ/2, so the "width" in that sense is ΔE = Γ. All right now ΔE = ħ Δω = 2π ħ Δf, so putting it all together you get Δf = 1/(2π Δτ).
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top