Uncovering the Mystery of Wave Momentum Transfer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of wave momentum transfer, revealing that mechanical waves, like photons, may exhibit net momentum transfer, challenging conventional understanding. A reference by Carl Mungan highlights that many physics professors incorrectly believe mechanical waves transfer zero net momentum. The conversation suggests that waves could be interpreted similarly to quantum mechanics' description of photons, as both waves and particles. Participants express interest in quantifying the momentum of sound waves and explore applications like ultrasonic acoustic levitation. The quest for equations and methods to understand these phenomena is emphasized, indicating a desire for deeper insights into wave mechanics.
Maxwell's Demon
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Apparently what I thought I understood about waves is wrong: there seems to be a net momentum transfer with mechanical waves, as well as photons (it seems they're perfectly analogous). I hope some of the experts on the board can help to clarify this issue; perhaps it’s less surprising to others here than it is to me.

I recently found this discussion on the topic of wave momentum started by Carl Mungan, Associate Professor at the US Naval Academy: http://www.usna.edu/Users/physics/mungan/Scholarship/WaveMomentum.html There’s a list of references at the bottom of the page, and this reference was cited in Dr. Mungan’s last post as his key reference: Reuben Benumof, "Simple harmonic motion in harmonic waves," AJP 48, 387-392 (May 1980)

If this is true, then everything else I’ve read online about wave momentum, and all the applets I’ve seen, are wrong (or at least confined to one special case scenario). And following the discussion in that link, it appears that most physics professors also incorrectly believe that mechanical waves transfer zero net momentum.

This question has gotten me thinking that maybe we can interpret any wave in the manner QM describes photons, as both a wave and a particle.

Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed any wave can be quantised -- leading to a particle of that particular wave. In condensed matter physics this is often done, leading to phonons, plasmons, etc.
 
genneth said:
Indeed any wave can be quantised -- leading to a particle of that particular wave. In condensed matter physics this is often done, leading to phonons, plasmons, etc.

Thanks genneth. It gives one a whole new perspective to look at macroscopic phenomena like waves on water as ‘wavicles.’ Weird.

I’m having some trouble finding the method for determining the net momentum of a sound wave – all the papers in Munga’s thread cost $19/ea for us untermenchen. I'd like to see what it would take to build a self-lifting ultrasonic acoustic levitation device (driven by an external power source).

Here's a video of acoustic levitation, which I think is pretty cool stuff: http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=acoustic+levitation&hl=en

Anyone got those equations handy? I’d be much obliged (well at least $19 worth ;)
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top