Undergraduate Major for Career in Nuclear Fusion

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the appropriate undergraduate major for a career in nuclear fusion, exploring the distinctions between physics, nuclear engineering, and engineering physics. Participants share their experiences and seek advice on how to best prepare for graduate studies and careers in fusion research.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that nuclear fusion is more aligned with physics than nuclear engineering, noting the differences between fusion and fission technologies.
  • There is a discussion about the employability of degrees in physics versus engineering physics, with some arguing that engineering physics may provide a better balance of practical and theoretical knowledge.
  • One participant shares their personal experience of switching majors and emphasizes the importance of aligning one's studies with career objectives.
  • Several participants recommend taking as many physics courses as possible, particularly in nuclear physics and plasma physics, to prepare for a career in fusion.
  • Some participants express a preference for engineering physics due to its practical applications and exposure to material science and electrical systems.
  • There are mentions of specific programs at universities, such as the University of Michigan and the University of Wisconsin, highlighting their strengths in nuclear engineering and engineering physics.
  • One participant raises the question of how to best position oneself for graduate school in fusion research, emphasizing the importance of undergraduate major selection.
  • Some participants suggest contacting faculty members for more information on specific curricula related to engineering physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best undergraduate major, with multiple competing views on the merits of physics, nuclear engineering, and engineering physics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which path is optimal for a career in nuclear fusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about the relationship between undergraduate majors and career outcomes in fusion research. There are also references to specific programs and courses that may influence decisions, but no definitive conclusions are drawn.

Who May Find This Useful

High school students considering careers in nuclear fusion, undergraduate students exploring major options in physics and engineering, and individuals interested in the academic pathways leading to fusion research.

DR13
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Hello. I am currently a senior in high school. I am currently taking AP Physics C and will be through calc III/diff eq by the time i graduate. I am interested in going into nuclear engineering but i do not just want to work at some power plant the rest of my life. I am interested in theorhetical type physics but i also enjoy the practicality and reality of engineering. So my idea is to go into nuclear fusion (as opposed to fission). I feel like this way i can work on a tangible solution to a real life problem while also working with something that is on the cutting edge of science.

So, my question is:
Does this make sense? (I hope some of you have some personal experience with this). And, as an undergrad, should i major in physics or nuclear engineering? (The other major i could do is engineering physics with a concentration on nuclear engineering. I feel that this would give me a solid base in physics while still giving me a nuclear engineering background)

Any and all advice is greatly appreciated
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Nuclear fusion is much more a branch of physics, rather than nuclear engineering. The two current approaches (tokamak and laser ignition) have nothing in common with the engineering related to nuclear fission reactors. Also if there is any breakthrough in some unconventional approach (like cold fusion) it will be as a result of work by physicists.
 
Thank you for the information.

So would you recommend that I major in physics or in engineering physics? I feel that if I major in engineering physics I would be more employable.
 
DR13 said:
Thank you for the information.

So would you recommend that I major in physics or in engineering physics? I feel that if I major in engineering physics I would be more employable.

It depends very much on your career objectives. For academic career I would lean toward physics - probably with a doctorate, for industry or government, maybe engineering physics. However I suspect you probably don't have to decide right away.
I'll give my own experience. I started college as a chemistry major, but in the middle of my sophomore year I realized two things - I like mathematics much more and also I was a lousy cook (chem lab), so I switched to mathematics.

I suggest you talk to someone (teacher or advisor) in your school.
 
Last edited:
If one is interested in fusion see this thread How to become a nuclear engineer.

Nuclear engineering programs expose one to physics (particularly nuclear physics, radiation interactions, . . . .), electrical engineering (circuits and electric power systems: generators, transformers, motors, . . .), mechanical engineering (thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, . . . . ), civil engineering (structural mechanics, . . .), as well as reactor physics (neutron transport and diffusion theory). Fusion engineering is usually an elective in the upper levels or graduate school.

I'd recommend taking as many physics courses as possible, particular nuclear physics, EM and plasma physics if one wishes to go into fusion, which is still in the research and demonstration phase.
 
Thanks to both of you for the information. I talked to the counsler at my school and did some other research and I feel that engineering physics would be the right direction for me. I feel that it would give me a good amount of physics as well as engineering. I think that this would give me the balance I was looking for.
 
DR13 said:
Thanks to both of you for the information. I talked to the counsler at my school and did some other research and I feel that engineering physics would be the right direction for me. I feel that it would give me a good amount of physics as well as engineering. I think that this would give me the balance I was looking for.

I would research various Nuclear Engineering and Electrical Engineering programs that schools have. Many programs have concentrations in Plasma physics which would be the type of thing you would be interested in. Search for "Plasma Engineering Programs", "Plasma Physics Programs", or "Plasma Physics Research" on google and you'll find a lot of info
 
I recently got accepted to university of michigan and plan on attending there. I researched their website and they do have a plasma/fusion program (for graduates). They provide a link for the graduate course cirriculum and I have posted it below. This would be my goal for grad school but I am still not sure as to what to do for undergrad. I realize that plasma and fusion is grad level stuff and I will not be doing it in undergrad (maybe towards the end of my undergrad). What i guess my question shoud be is what undergrad major would put me in the best position to get into and succeed in grad school for a career in fusion research?

http://www-ners.engin.umich.edu/areas/plasmafusion/plasmafusionoption.pdf

Again, thank you all for your time
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here are some additional links if they are useful:

NERS courses:
http://www-ners.engin.umich.edu/undergraduate/courses.html

MS and PhD requirements:
http://www-ners.engin.umich.edu/graduate/requirements/NersPhdMsRequirements.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
anyone?...
 
  • #11
I'd recommend a BS degree in Nuclear Engineering or Engineering Physics, or perhaps even Physics. Alternatively one could do a degree in Nuclear Engineering with a minor in Physics, or a double major.

My approach was to start in Physics and migrate to Nuclear Engineering. I also took electives in EE, Materials Science, Mech Eng, and Aerospace Engineering during my undergrad and graduate programs.

UMich is a good school.

U of Wisconsin has an interesting approach. The nuclear engineering program is in the Department of Engineering Physics.
http://www.engr.wisc.edu/ep/faculty/
 
  • #12
Personally, I would recommend strongly an Engineering Physics undergrad for fusion. The engineering approach to physics tends to expose you to more of the practical issues such as material science, electrical circuits and systems and numerical computation which are frequently left out of pure physics degrees.

Once you get to grad school you can take more plasma physics or laser physics.
 
  • #13
Astronuc said:
I'd recommend a BS degree in Nuclear Engineering or Engineering Physics, or perhaps even Physics. Alternatively one could do a degree in Nuclear Engineering with a minor in Physics, or a double major.

Well, this is the question that I began with. Should I major in Engineering Physics with a concentration on nuclear or plain Nuclear Engineering? I do not want to do physics because I would rather not go to LS&A. Michigan does the same thing as wisc-madison (EP program is in the NERS college).
 
  • #14
DR13 said:
Well, this is the question that I began with. Should I major in Engineering Physics with a concentration on nuclear or plain Nuclear Engineering? I do not want to do physics because I would rather not go to LS&A. Michigan does the same thing as wisc-madison (EP program is in the NERS college).
I was looking for a curriculum for Engineering Physics, which is supposed to be in a pdf, but that apparently does not now exist.

http://www-ners.engin.umich.edu/undergraduate/physics/curriculum.html

I'd recommend that you contact the faculty members responsible for EP, explain your goals, and ask for a curriculum.
http://www-ners.engin.umich.edu/undergraduate/physics/counseling.html

I plan on contacting them myself.
 
  • #15
Astronuc said:
I was looking for a curriculum for Engineering Physics, which is supposed to be in a pdf, but that apparently does not now exist.

http://www-ners.engin.umich.edu/undergraduate/physics/curriculum.html

I'd recommend that you contact the faculty members responsible for EP, explain your goals, and ask for a curriculum.
http://www-ners.engin.umich.edu/undergraduate/physics/counseling.html

I plan on contacting them myself.

Though it does not exist online, I do have a hard copy of it. I went up there once and got some brief information. One of the things I got was the sample course selection for EP
 
  • #16
DR13 said:
Though it does not exist online, I do have a hard copy of it. I went up there once and got some brief information. One of the things I got was the sample course selection for EP
I would compare the NE and EP programs to see what courses are redundant and which are unique. If I was looking at an undergrad program with the intent on going into fusion, I'd lean toward a major in EP with minor in NE. The key nuclear courses in NE are the reactor physics (or neutron physics) courses, and plant design.

Bear in mind that controlled fusion that produces net energy economically is still a very iffy proposition.
 
  • #17
Astronuc said:
Bear in mind that controlled fusion that produces net energy economically is still a very iffy proposition.

What exactly do you mean by this? Is the pay not good for those who go into fusion? Or, are you saying that fusion research is not being adequately funded? Or, are you saying that we have not yet been able to use fusion to make economically viable energy?

To my last question: this is what i am excited about. I want to go into something that is only in the R&D phase. I want to work on something that will benefit society. As I mentioned earlier i do not just want to work at some power plant the rest of my life.
 
  • #18
DR13 said:
What exactly do you mean by this? Is the pay not good for those who go into fusion? Or, are you saying that fusion research is not being adequately funded? Or, are you saying that we have not yet been able to use fusion to make economically viable energy?
We're not there yet. There is hope that ITER will demonstrate some net energy, but demonstrating the economy of fusion is still a ways beyond success of ITER - assuming it is successful.

To my last question: this is what i am excited about. I want to go into something that is only in the R&D phase. I want to work on something that will benefit society. As I mentioned earlier i do not just want to work at some power plant the rest of my life.
It's possible that fusion scientists are well paid, but it is very competitive.

As far as I know, in the US the job market is tight for those in fusion, and support for R&D is rather limited. That's why there are so few NE programs with options in fusion.
 
  • #19
This might be of interest.

http://www.ipp.mpg.de/ippcms/eng/for/projekte/asdex/index.html

http://www.ipp.mpg.de/ippcms/eng/for/projekte/asdex/ziele/index.html

http://www.ipp.mpg.de/ippcms/eng/for/projekte/asdex/techdata.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #20
Astronuc said:
This might be of interest.

http://www.ipp.mpg.de/ippcms/eng/for/projekte/asdex/index.html

http://www.ipp.mpg.de/ippcms/eng/for/projekte/asdex/ziele/index.html

http://www.ipp.mpg.de/ippcms/eng/for/projekte/asdex/techdata.html

First, let me say thanks for the information.

One thing that I have noticed is that many fusion programs are based in european nations. I am American and would like to keep it that way. Are there any fusion projects (in industry, not through a university) in America. I have looked at the websites for National Ignition Facility, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and General Atomics. Do you have any opinion on these companies (i.e. which would be the best to work at, which have adequate funding, etc)? And do you have any information on other good fusion companies? Or, to go to a good place for fusion will I have to leave the US?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
DR13 said:
First, let me say thanks for the information.

One thing that I have noticed is that many fusion programs are based in european nations. I am American and would like to keep it that way. Are there any fusion projects (in industry, not through a university) in America. I have looked at the websites for National Ignition Facility, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and General Atomics. Do you have any opinion on these companies (i.e. which would be the best to work at, which have adequate funding, etc)? And do you have any information on other good fusion companies? Or, to go to a good place for fusion will I have to leave the US?
NIF is a program of the National Nuclear Security Administration, and is part of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). LLNL focuses on inertial confinement, as opposed to magnetic confinement for fusion. It is well funded at present.

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) does not have a fusion program, but it does have a materials research program that looks at effects of high energy radiation (particularly neutrons) on materials. It is well funded.

General Atomics is a private company (AFAIK) is a diversified technology company. They make targets for ICF, and they have a Tokamak (DIII-D) fusion reactor. As private companies go, they would offer the best opportunity for fusion.
http://fusion.gat.com/global/DIII-D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K