Understand Ehv DC Transmission: I2R Losses Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter asad1111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dc Transmission
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the comparison of I²R losses in high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission versus alternating current (AC) transmission. Participants explore the implications of these losses, the advantages of HVDC, and the technical considerations involved in high voltage transmission systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the significance of I²R losses in HVDC compared to AC, suggesting that these losses are similar for both types of transmission.
  • Another participant argues that I²R losses decrease with higher voltage due to reduced current for the same power, emphasizing that parallel losses are more significant in AC due to lossy dielectrics.
  • A participant notes that if DC current and RMS current are the same, heat dissipation will also be the same, setting limits on current capacity.
  • It is mentioned that using higher voltage improves efficiency and power delivery, with AC being easier to implement at consumer ends due to transformers.
  • Some participants highlight the cost benefits of using cheaper insulators in HVDC due to the absence of AC peak voltage, which simplifies the construction of transmission lines.
  • There is a discussion about the use of Earth as a return conductor in HVDC systems, with some participants noting that this practice has changed over time for safety and reliability reasons.
  • A later reply raises a concern about the potential vulnerability of HVDC systems to solar flare-induced magnetic storms, suggesting that Earth return may increase the area for induction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance and implications of I²R losses in HVDC versus AC transmission, with no consensus reached on the overall advantages or disadvantages of each system.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on specific assumptions about current types and transmission line configurations, and there are unresolved questions regarding the impact of environmental factors on HVDC systems.

asad1111
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
i have read that in high voltage transmission line dc is preffered on ac and i know all advantages and disadvantages but one main disadvantage that i cannot find was I^2*R losses which was the main reason why we use ac on the first place can someone please explain that?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
asad1111 said:
i have read that in high voltage transmission line dc is preffered on ac and i know all advantages and disadvantages but one main disadvantage that i cannot find was I^2*R losses which was the main reason why we use ac on the first place can someone please explain that?

You're mistaken, I^2*R losses are much the same for both AC and DC. Reducing I^2R losses is the reason for going to higher voltages in either case (both AC and DC).

I^2R losses are "series" losses. These losses decrease with the use of higher voltage due to the fact that you need less current for the same amount of power.

It's parallel losses that increase with with increasing voltage, however here there is much asymmetry between the AC and the DC case. This is because the shunt conductance that would cause parallel losses are typically not simple conductances, but rather are lossy dielectrics. Like a lossy capacitor this is an AC phenomenon. So the shunt losses are far greater for AC than they are for DC, that's the real advantage of DC at extremely high voltages.
 
Last edited:
For a given transmission line, if the DC current and the RMS current are the same, then the heat dissipation of the line will be the same for DC or AC.

So, this sets an upper limit on how much current the line can carry.

The voltage drop also depends on this current and the resistance of the wires.

Using a higher voltage (AC or DC) results in more total power being delivered and better efficiency.

Developing this higher voltage, and using it at the consumer end of the line, is currently easier using AC and transformers, but DC has some advantages, particularly if the transfer of power is between countries that use different electrical standards for domestic power supply.
 
The transmission line can use cheaper insulators because there's no AC peak voltage in DC - 1000 kv is 1000kv not 1414kv.

By using Earth for return they reduce # of wires and insulators , so the towers can be of lighter construction.
 
jim hardy said:
The transmission line can use cheaper insulators because there's no AC peak voltage in DC - 1000 kv is 1000kv not 1414kv.

By using Earth for return they reduce # of wires and insulators , so the towers can be of lighter construction.

In my country, AC transmission does not use the Earth as a conductor. It is used for safety reasons, but does not normally carry a current.

There used to be some single wire transmission systems in remote areas, but these have been phased out for reasons of safety and reliability.
 
""In my country, AC transmission does not use the Earth as a conductor. It is used for safety reasons, but does not normally carry a current.""

same here. i was describing hvdc which in its real early days used Earth for return. i assume it still does.

sorry about the confusion.

one wonders whether that Earth return would make HVDC more vulnerable to those solar flare induced magnetic storms discussed in another thread... sure increases the area available for induction.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K